Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Re: [GTh] Thomas Tradition and Tyre I

Expand Messages
  • fmmccoy
    INTRODUCTION On July 16, 2002, I sent in a two post argument for the hypothesis that, within GTh, is an earlier document that can be called Proto-Thomas. On
    Message 1 of 1 , Aug 2, 2002
    View Source
    • 0 Attachment
      INTRODUCTION

      On July 16, 2002, I sent in a two post argument for the hypothesis that,
      within GTh, is an earlier document that can be called Proto-Thomas.

      On further review of the evidence, I have found that this is over-simplistic
      in that there appears to be yet another document embedded in GTh as well:
      which can be called Pre-Thomas.

      This other pre-GTh document, like Proto-Thomas, appears to have been written
      at Tyre.

      However, it reveals, the church at Tyre was more heterogeneous than is
      indicated in Proto-Thomas and had a complex history.

      In terms of document history, this is the scenario is proposed in this
      current series of nine posts:

      1.c. 60 CE Proto-Thomas was written by one of the Gentile leaders of the
      Tyrian church:
      2.c. 75 CE Pre-Thomas was written by a Jewish member of the Tyrian church
      3. c. 85 CE Proto-Thomas is expanded into GTh by adding, to it, the material
      in Pre-Thomas and some other material available to its author. This was
      done by a Gentile member of the Tyrian church.

      In this scenario, there are three strata in GTh: (1) the earliest strata,
      consisting of the material in Proto-Thomas, (2) the second strata,
      consisting of the material in Pre-Thomas, and (3) the latest strata,
      consisting of the rest of the material in Gth.

      In this post, the procedures by which the postulated Proto-Thomas and
      Pre-Thomas documents are determined is given and the order of stratification
      in GTh is discussed.. In the second post, the text of Proto-Thomas is
      given. In the third post, the text of Pre-Thomas is given. In the fourth
      post, the relative dating of the three strata is estimated. It is concluded
      that Proto-Thomas is earliest, Pre-Thomas was written next, and the latest
      strata lives up to its name. In the fifth post, an attempt is made to
      determine the socio-economic perspective of each of the three strata. It is
      concluded that the first strata comes from a Gentile upper class
      perspective, the second strata comes from a Diaspora Jewish middle to lower
      class perspective, and the third strata comes from a Gentile middle to lower
      class perspective. It is postulated that the Thomas church was located in
      the Diaspora and had a Gentile upper class leadership, with the rest of the
      members, who ranged from the middle to lower class, divided into a Jewish
      group and a Gentile group. In the sixth post, evidence is presented which
      indicates that, to be more precise, the Thomas church was located at Tyre: a
      major port city, in the Diaspora, located in Syro-Phoenicia (modern
      Lebanon). In the seventh post, an attempt is made to determine the sitz im
      leben for each of the three strata. It is concluded that the first strata,
      Proto-Thomas, was written c. 60 CE, several years after Paul had visited
      Tyre and while there was an on-going communication between the Tyrian church
      and the Q community in near-by Galilee; that the second strata, Pre-Thomas,
      was written c. 75 CE after the searing events of the Jewish revolt,
      including the destruction of the temple and the persecution of the Tyrian
      Jewish Christians during the revolt; and the third strata,
      the latest strata, dates to c. 85 CE, soon after GMatthew was written. In
      the eighth post, Thomas Christianity will be reviewed. There are some
      constants in it: a Jesus who is similar in many ways to the Word of Philo's
      teaching, a Kingdom that is remarkably similar to the Wisdom of the Jewish
      Wisdom tradition, and the revering of Jesus' words for their unique value.
      There is also some developments in thought. In the second strata, in the
      searing light of the horrors of the Jewish revolt of 66-70 CE, the world
      comes to be viewed as an evil realm that needs to be renounced. In both the
      second and third strata, there is a stress on family strife and on how the
      followers of Jesus are the enlightened few which indicates that most of the
      Tyrian population. both Gentile and Jew, had become strongly anti-Christian.
      In the third strata, there develops the idea that these enlightened few,
      furthermore, have their origin in a place of light and ideal Platonic forms
      and it is to there that they return after their brief sojourn on earth. In
      the ninth post, some closing comments are made.

      THE CONCEPT OF A SECTION

      It appears that Proto-Thomas consists of three sections and that Pre-Thomas
      consists of a short prologue, a section, and a short postlogue.

      These are the rules of composition for a section:
      1. Where each of the modern 114 divisions of GTh is called a unit, the
      number of units in a section is always a square number, i.e., 1, 4, 9, 16,
      etc.
      2. A section always contains more than one unit, so that the minimum number
      of units in a section is four.
      3. The first unit and the last unit of a section will either both be saying
      units (where a saying unit is a unit that solely consists of a saying of
      Jesus) or else dialogue units (where a dialogue unit is a unit in which
      Jesus carries on a dialogue with one or more people).
      4. After the first unit, next will come x number of saying units (where x =
      the number being squared), e.g., for a section composed of nine units, as it
      is the square of three, next will come three sayings units.
      5. If applicable (i.e., if the section contains more than four units), next
      will come a unit that will be a dialogue unit if the first unit is a saying
      unit and a saying unit if the first unit is a dialogue unit.
      6. If applicable (i.e., if the section contains nine or mere units), steps 4
      and 5 are repeated until the end unit of the section is reached.

      So, where (1) s = a sayings unit, (2) d = a dialogue unit, and (3) the
      first unit, the last unit, and each unit involved in step 5 are capitalized,
      a four unit section will be:
      SssS or DssD
      Again, a nine unit section will be:
      SsssDsssS or DsssSsssD
      Agaain, a 16 unit section will be:
      SssssDssssDssssS or DssssSssssSssssSsssD.
      Etc., etc.

      THE COMPOSITION OF PROTO-THOMAS

      Proto-Thomas consists of: (1) 2-10, which is a nine unit segment
      (SsssDsssS), (2) 31-48 + 61-65 + 89-90, which is a 25 unit segment
      (SsssssDsssssDsssssDsssssS) and (3) 91-99, which is a nine unit segment
      (DsssSsssD).

      THE COMPOSITION OF PRE-THOMAS

      Pre-Thomas is envisoned to consist of (1) the intro to GTh ("These are the
      secret sayings which the living Jesus spoke and which Didymos Judas Thomas
      wrote down."), and (2) 1 + 25-30 + 53-60 + 66-79 + 105-111, which is a 36
      unit section (SssssssDssssssDssssssDssssssDssssssS), whose last unit (i.e.,
      111) concludes with a brief postlogue, "Did not Jesus say, 'Whoever finds
      himself is superior to the world?'".

      THE FINAL STRATA IN GTH

      What does not belong in either Proto-Thomas or Pre-Thomas is what belongs to
      the latest strata in GTh. This consists of 11-24, 49-52, 80-88, 100-104,
      and 112-114.

      THE STRATA SEQUENCE IN GTHOMAS

      This is the sequence of strata elements in GThomas (strata 1 element =
      Proto-Thomas, strata 2 element = Pre-Thomas, strata element 3 = late
      strata):
      Strata 2: Intro + unit 1
      Strata 1: units 2-10
      Strata 3: units 11-24
      Strata 2: units 25-30
      Strata 1: units 31-48
      Strata 3: units 49-52
      Strata 2: units 53-60
      Strata 1 units 61-65
      Strata 2: units 66-79
      Strata 3: units 80-88
      Strata 1: units 89-99
      Strata 3: units 100-104
      Strata 2: units 105-111
      Strata 3: units 112-114

      If one postulates that these strata elements are lumped into strata element
      cycles, with each strata 1 element being the second element in a strata
      element cycle, then there are four strata element cycles: 1. a 2-1-3 cycle,
      2. a.2-1-3 cycle, 3. a 2-1-2 cycle, and 4. a 3-1-3-2-3 cycle.

      Note that strata element cycles 1 and 2 are identical and, when added
      together, total *6* strata elements. Cycle 3 is a unique strata element
      cycle of *3* strata elements. Cycle 4 is a unique strata element cycle of
      *5* strata elements.

      Perhaps it is pure coincidence that each of the postulated segments
      postulated to be incorporated into GTh from pre-exisitng documents either
      contains *6* squared (36) units or else *3* squared (9) units or else *5*
      squared (25) units.. However, if not, then it is a message, by the author
      of GTh, that GTh incorporates some segments from pre-existing documents:
      with each such segment either being a *6* squared (36) unit segment or else
      a *3* squared (9) unit segment or else a *5* squared (25)
      unit segment.

      (Continued in Part II of a IX part posting)

      Frank McCoy
      1809 N. English Apt. 17
      Maplewood, MN USA 55109
    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.