[gthomas] Re: It takes Guts to say Jesus
- Robert Tessman wrote:
> Mike himself pointed out the suspect nature of unnecessaryI totally agree. I can't see the value in such a practice. Consideration of
> obscurity in writing. If we have a name that everybody agrees upon why
> cause confusion by refusing to use that name? It is enlightening, for
> instance, to point out the original phonetic name of Jesus in a
> text but to
> then stick to that obscure and mostly unrecognized name throughout and
> simply because it is more approximate to the original is quite unnecessary
> and blatantly priggish.
all parties seems to me better then anything total individual liberty can
ever bring. Get more done for one thing.