7525Re: [GTh] Thomas saying 64 and the synoptics
- Mar 4 10:10 PMDavid Arbuckle wrote:
> In Robert Eisenman's book James the Just, he claimsEisenman speculates way too much to be considered a
> that Origen says this because in the original versions
> of Josephus that is exactly what it says.
reputable authority, and James isn't such a major figure in
Josephus that this possibility can be seriously maintained.
There's more on this subject in my note of 9/22/06:
> He claims the Church redacted it because they had theThis makes no sense. If the church altered Josephus,
> copies of Josephus, but apparently a syriac version of
> it conflicts with it....
why didn't they make it say what Origen claimed it said?
(You may be mixing this up with Josephus' Jesus
passage - the "Testimonium". That was altered, for sure.)
- << Previous post in topic Next post in topic >>