Re: [greenwichcyclists] Highway code revision
- This is a bit out of date? CTC have tackled this and now it reads:
Rule 61: Cycle Facilities. Use cycle routes, advanced stop lines,
cycle boxes and toucan crossings unless at the time it is unsafe to do
so. Use of these facilities is not compulsory and will depend on your
experience and skills, but they can make your journey safer.
On 11/06/07, Doug <smithx@...> wrote:
> Petition to stop approval of the revised highway code
> The revised Highway Code says cyclists should "use cycle facilities
> possible". If this Code is approved, cyclists will effectively lose
> the right to ride on the road where there are alternative routes or
> adjacent facilities. The implications of this are too bad to
> First we will suffer more abuse and intimidating driving. Second, if a
> cyclist is involved in an accident and tries to claim damages, the
> insurance companies are likely to argue that the rider contributed to
> the accident by not using the cycle facility.
> The Highway Code has been laid before parliament. It will
> automatically be approved unless it is referred to a House of Commons
> Committee which cannot amend it and can only recommend the whole
> document be rejected. It will take an unprecedented amount of adverse
> publicity to persuade the government to reject the Highway Code in its
> It is interesting to note that 35 MP's objected to the original
> revised wording. Unfortunately, the replacement wording is no better.
> Only 11,000 objections were received to the previous wording. If this
> Highway Code is approved by government cyclists will effectively lose
> the right to
> ride on the road where there are alternative routes or adjacent
> Please register your name on the petition and persuade others to do
> the same.
> Tiscali Broadband only £9.99 a month for your first 3 months! http://www.tiscali.co.uk/products/broadband/