Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

What's w/ this club?

Expand Messages
  • patentlord
    I m been lurking for awhile now. Where s everybody? Until the last two posts, why haven t people posted or responded to postings? I ll start a new
    Message 1 of 56 , Nov 22, 2000
      I'm been lurking for awhile now. Where's
      everybody? Until the last two posts, why haven't people
      posted or responded to postings?<br><br>I'll start a new
      topic. This is already old news, but the recent salary
      escalation seems to have slowed. What are people getting
      these days at their firm. My salary as a 6th year at a
      Chicago (3p, 4a) firm is $150K. We'll see what kind of
      bonus I get this year end since there's no way in hell
      I'll make my hours (due to issues unrelated to me).
      I'm sure my number is relatively low for Chicago, but
      I like the people, the hours and the upside
      potential.<br><br>Hope to hear from people soon.
    • Alun
      ... target=new http://www.patentcomplete.com You don t need a PhD to properly analyze 90% of inventions. Given that you generally need a degree in a
      Message 56 of 56 , Nov 8, 2002
        --- In greedyipassociates@y..., diamonds_hof wrote:
        > Yes, some firms do their own patent searching. If
        > the topic is not too technical that is probably a
        > good way to do it. But, we specialize in searches in
        > biotech, physics, chemical engineering, and other such
        > topics. To do a good search on these things, you really
        > need to have a Ph.D. (or at least graduate training)
        > to make sure you can properly analyze the invention,
        > and the prior art.<br><br>By the way, we just put up
        > a new web site. Check it out:
        > <a href=http://www.patentcomplete.com

        You don't need a PhD to properly analyze 90% of inventions. Given that
        you generally need a degree in a technical subject to get a
        registration number (notwithstanding some people I could mention with
        a psychology degree and a few credits in C++!) obviously the
        professionals in patent law firms will have the technical background
        to do the search. If they didn't, then they would hardly be qualified
        to write and prosecute the applications, would they?

        I was a searcher for a long time before becoming an agent, and have
        seen this from both sides. Generally, a search is only done if the
        applicant thinks it worthwhile. Many (most?) of them think they know
        the state of their particular art much better than they really do (
        especially ignoring the many patents that never see the light of day
        as products), and so no search ends up being done. The patent
        attorney/agent is often loath to push the client towards a search, as
        they may not get to write an application, but relatively few
        applicants raise the issue themselves.

        Many law firms do use searchers who lack any technical background,
        which I have never thought was wise, although some of them are very
        good on simple mechanical art. The fact is that the law firms are
        driven by cost (they have to keep the cost low relative to the cost of
        preparing the application), and as a result searching does not pay
        very well for those who have the background it really requires. This
        is one reason I quit the search firm I had worked at for 16 years and
        became a patent agent. If you have a staff of PhDs, I imagine that
        they were previously working in acadaemia, as that is about the only
        place where technical qualifications will get you an even lower wage
        than in a search firm. My apologies if that seems a little unkind, but
        it is what I have observed.
      Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.