## A Rotation with Translation Movement is standalone natural phenomenon.

## Statement of proof.

Let's take two identical thin cylinders which stay initially relatively to an observer. These cylinders will repulse to each other.

Let's make two experiments.__The first experiment.__The cylinders repulse to each other from their center of mass. These cylinders start moving relatively to observer and they move opposite relatively to each other. Base on law of momentum conservation, their linear velocities are identical relatively to the observer. Let's measure their kinetic energies. The full kinetic energy is equal to:

As it shown on equation their energies are equal.

Let's compare their translation and angular momentums.

As it shown on equation their momentums are equal.

For this experiment these cylinders have symmetric action as translation movement relatively to initial event (repulsing) and observer.**The second experiment.**

The cylinders repulse to each other from their different parts. One cylinder is repulsing form his center mass. Another cylinder is repulsing from his edge. These cylinders start moving relatively to observer and they move opposite relatively to each other. Base on law of momentum conservation let's assume their linear velocities are identical relatively to the observer. Only one of these cylinders rotates. Let's measure their kinetic energies. The full kinetic energy is equal to:As it shown on equation their energies are not equal.

Let's compare their translation and angular momentums.As it shown on equation their linear momentums are equal. However the angular momentums are not equal. Only one of these cylinders has angular momentum.__This experiment action is not symmetric relatively to initial event (repulsing) and observer.____This assumption broke the law of angular momentum conservation. The body can't start own rotating without symmetrical action.____This mean the assumption about identical linear velocity was wrong.__One even can't reproduce two type of movements together for one object.__One event can reproduce only one type of movement per object.__On experiment 1 both objects have only one translation movement.

The experiment 2 shows only one type of movements for one object and two types of movements for other object. However these objects taked only one event(repulsing). It means it should be one type of movements per object and translation with rotation movements for this experiment should be described as new type of moments.__The experiment 2 shows situation where the translation with rotation movement as a standalone natural phenomenon. This movement should have own momentum and law of momentum conservation.__My assumption this movement have a linear and angular momentums together.The full momentum of rotation with translation movement is:note: Pj - linear momentum Lk - angular momentum Ru - unit radiusThis is the law of momentum conservation for the translation with rotation movement:This law has a complex number and it has linear and angular momentums.Full momentum transfer for this movement has calculation by absolute value:

For example: if reverse time back for experiment 2 then one cylinders angular L2 and translation P2 momentums compensated by another cylinders only translation momentum P1.

For this case equation between momentums is:Full kinetic energy of rotation with translation movement is:__Follow law of momentum conservation and using complex number for translation with rotation momentum, the cylinders translation velocities have a different value on experiment 2.__======Base on previous statement it possible to say the translation with rotation movement is covering translation and rotation movements together. One of these movements is the simple version of main complicated movement.

## email: abelov0927@...

- I have a few simple questions...Very concisely, please briefly and simplisticly explain the following...1. What is gravity? How does it work and what does it affect?2. What is antigravity? How does it work and what does it affect?Shalom and thank you.-Katriel
--- On

**Mon, 8/10/09, abelov0927**wrote:*<abelov0927@...>*

From: abelov0927 <abelov0927@...>

Subject: Gravitational Propulsion, A Rotation with Translation Movement is standalone natural phenomenon(version 2)

To: gravitationalpropulsionstevenson@yahoogroups.com

Date: Monday, August 10, 2009, 11:14 AM## A Rotation with Translation Movement is standalone natural phenomenon.

## Statement of proof.

Let's take two identical thin cylinders which stay initially relatively to an observer. These cylinders will repulse to each other.

Let's make two experiments.__The first experiment.__The cylinders repulse to each other from their center of mass. These cylinders start moving relatively to observer and they move opposite relatively to each other. Base on law of momentum conservation, their linear velocities are identical relatively to the observer. Let's measure their kinetic energies. The full kinetic energy is equal to:

As it shown on equation their energies are equal.

Let's compare their translation and angular momentums.

As it shown on equation their momentums are equal.

For this experiment these cylinders have symmetric action as translation movement relatively to initial event (repulsing) and observer.**The second experiment.**

The cylinders repulse to each other from their different parts. One cylinder is repulsing form his center mass. Another cylinder is repulsing from his edge. These cylinders start moving relatively to observer and they move opposite relatively to each other. Base on law of momentum conservation let's assume their linear velocities are identical relatively to the observer. Only one of these cylinders rotates. Let's measure their kinetic energies. The full kinetic energy is equal to:As it shown on equation their energies are not equal.

Let's compare their translation and angular momentums.As it shown on equation their linear momentums are equal. However the angular momentums are not equal. Only one of these cylinders has angular momentum.__This experiment action is not symmetric relatively to initial event (repulsing) and observer.____This assumption broke the law of angular momentum conservation. The body can't start own rotating without symmetrical action.____This mean the assumption about identical linear velocity was wrong.__One even can't reproduce two type of movements together for one object.__One event can reproduce only one type of movement per object.__On experiment 1 both objects have only one translation movement.

The experiment 2 shows only one type of movements for one object and two types of movements for other object. However these objects taked only one event(repulsing) . It means it should be one type of movements per object and translation with rotation movements for this experiment should be described as new type of moments.__The experiment 2 shows situation where the translation with rotation movement as a standalone natural phenomenon. This movement should have own momentum and law of momentum conservation.__My assumption this movement have a linear and angular momentums together.The full momentum of rotation with translation movement is:note: Pj - linear momentum Lk - angular momentum Ru - unit radiusThis is the law of momentum conservation for the translation with rotation movement:This law has a complex number and it has linear and angular momentums.Full momentum transfer for this movement has calculation by absolute value:

For example: if reverse time back for experiment 2 then one cylinders angular L2 and translation P2 momentums compensated by another cylinders only translation momentum P1.

For this case equation between momentums is:Full kinetic energy of rotation with translation movement is:__Follow law of momentum conservation and using complex number for translation with rotation momentum, the cylinders translation velocities have a different value on experiment 2.__======Base on previous statement it possible to say the translation with rotation movement is covering translation and rotation movements together. One of these movements is the simple version of main complicated movement.## email: abelov0927@gmail. com

Hello Katriel,

I only noticed your post just now, but would like to add a partial answer to your question # 2 as to antigravity.

We have this in our files and at a few places on the web, but thought to quickly repeat it for those that may have not seen it.

ANTI-GRAVITY ;

Any effect produced by a multitude of devices to repel, nullify, or interact with gravity, in order to propel said devices.For more see;

http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/antigravityThis definition is also located on one site that is about to be deleted along with

on**all sites****Geocities**and so would be a good time to copy this group of definitions if you have not done so at;http://www.geocities.com/mysterystevenson1/Definitions.html

That link will very soon be gone!

That is only a very broadbased definition of antigravity and does need much modification to become encyclopedic in nature. There is also an antigravitational natural effect that is not described by that definition, however it may be very closely inclusive within that definition as to effect without being actually caused of course by a manmade device. I will attempt to offer more on this in the future as well as some descriptive data as to gravity, Q#1. This is just a quick reply, for now, until I have time to go into more depth. Perhaps some of the others would like to offer their comments in the meantime especially abelov0927 , forgive me if you intended this question only for abelov0927 .

*Mystery*--- In gravitationalpropulsionstevenson@yahoogroups.com, Katriel Porth <batl4etrnity@...> wrote:

I have a few simple questions...

Very concisely, please briefly and simplisticly explain the following...

1. What is gravity? How does it work and what does it affect?

2. What is antigravity? How does it work and what does it affect?

Shalom and thank you.

-Katriel- Hi

I reply message from other group.

It would be helpfull for you.

Have a fun.

Alex

...

Hi Alex,

I'm not sure to understand all what you mean and may be I'm wrong on some

points.

So here is my simulation to clarify the problem (a hard work :-):

http://exvacuo.free.fr/div/Sciences/Experiences/Meca/Momentum/com.wm2d

If you have not Workingmodel software (it is free), here is the video (6Mb,

probably long to download):

http://exvacuo.free.fr/div/Sciences/Experiences/Meca/Momentum/com.avi

Here are 3 jpg snapshots. Nï¿½0 is the initial position. Nï¿½1 is the state just

after the pulse. Nï¿½2 is some seconds later.

http://exvacuo.free.fr/div/Sciences/Experiences/Meca/Momentum/com0.jpg

http://exvacuo.free.fr/div/Sciences/Experiences/Meca/Momentum/com1.jpg

http://exvacuo.free.fr/div/Sciences/Experiences/Meca/Momentum/com2.jpg

The speed vector of each rod is displayed in the animation. The impulse force it

not displayed. It provides 100 N during 0.01s between the rods, at points of

same coordinates (= the position of the center of mass of the green rod).

In the red and green small windows, you can monitor the speeds, kinetic energies

and momenta of each rod. The default equations of the program are used.

In the small blue windows, I have put the equations to obtain the angular speed,

the moment of inertia and the angular momentum of each rod, calculated from the

common center of mass of the system.

This center of mass is displayed in the simulation (it is calculated by the

program, it's not a fixed point. It is at rest because there is no external

force acting onto the system. It is the mid-point of the line joining the

centers of mass of the two rods).

To simplify the calculi, the positions of the rods are chosen in order the

common center of mass to be at position x,y = 0,0.

With this simulation, I have discovered that from the common center of mass C,

each rod possesses a "hidden" angular momentum: each rod flies horizontally away

one another but one is above and the other under the horizontal x axis

containing their common center of mass. Thus the angle delimited by the

horizontal x axis and the line joining the centers of mass of the two rods

(crossing at C), decreases when the distance of the rods from the origin

increases. This variation of the angle is to be considered as an angular

velocity. Then from it, we can calculate the moment of inertia of each rod and

its angular momentum. The result is displayed in the small blue windows.

IMPORTANT : We see that the sum of the angular momenta of the two rods,

calculated in the referential frame of their common center of mass, is equal but

with opposite sign, to the angular momentum of the only rotating rod, calculated

in its proper frame.

Thus by adding these two momenta, we find zero. I guess the key of the problem

lies around this, but it is not yet completely clear for me.

Franï¿½ois

--- In gravitationalpropulsionstevenson@yahoogroups.com, Katriel Porth <batl4etrnity@...> wrote:

I have a few simple questions...

Very concisely, please briefly and simplisticly explain the following...

1. What is gravity? How does it work and what does it affect?

2. What is antigravity? How does it work and what does it affect?

Shalom and thank you.

-Katriel