Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Re: [govtrack] DADT repeal bill - 2 actions that should be votes

Expand Messages
  • Josh Tauberer
    Got it. Also did (or is doing, not sure if it s done) a full re-parse of the data with a few other vote fixes. Btw, Congress 3.0 is looking great. Everyone
    Message 1 of 3 , Feb 25, 2011
    • 0 Attachment
      Got it. Also did (or is doing, not sure if it's done) a full re-parse of
      the data with a few other vote fixes.

      Btw, Congress 3.0 is looking great. Everyone should check it out
      (http://sunlightlabs.com/blog/2011/congress-for-android-3).

      - Josh Tauberer
      - CivicImpulse / GovTrack.us

      http://razor.occams.info | www.govtrack.us | civicimpulse.com

      "Members of both sides are reminded not to use guests of the
      House as props."

      On 02/24/2011 04:07 PM, Eric Mill wrote:
      > On H.R. 2965, the DADT Repeal Act from December 2010, the only<vote>
      > elements are from the bill's past life as a small business bill,
      > before it got shelled and replaced.
      >
      > http://www.govtrack.us/data/us/111/bills/h2965.xml
      >
      > -- Eric
      >
      >
      > ------------------------------------
      >
      > Yahoo! Groups Links
      >
      >
      >
    • Eric Mill
      Thanks on both counts! :)
      Message 2 of 3 , Feb 25, 2011
      • 0 Attachment
        Thanks on both counts! :)

        On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 6:38 PM, Josh Tauberer <tauberer@...> wrote:
        > Got it. Also did (or is doing, not sure if it's done) a full re-parse of
        > the data with a few other vote fixes.
        >
        > Btw, Congress 3.0 is looking great. Everyone should check it out
        > (http://sunlightlabs.com/blog/2011/congress-for-android-3).
        >
        > - Josh Tauberer
        > - CivicImpulse / GovTrack.us
        >
        > http://razor.occams.info | www.govtrack.us | civicimpulse.com
        >
        > "Members of both sides are reminded not to use guests of the
        > House as props."
        >
        > On 02/24/2011 04:07 PM, Eric Mill wrote:
        >> On H.R. 2965, the DADT Repeal Act from December 2010, the only<vote>
        >> elements are from the bill's past life as a small business bill,
        >> before it got shelled and replaced.
        >>
        >> http://www.govtrack.us/data/us/111/bills/h2965.xml
        >>
        >> -- Eric
        >>
        >>
        >> ------------------------------------
        >>
        >> Yahoo! Groups Links
        >>
        >>
        >>
        >
        >
        > ------------------------------------
        >
        > Yahoo! Groups Links
        >
        >
        >
        >
      Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.