Re: [gothic-l] Re: Toledo
- How long did it take Norse to die out among the Normans?
Certainly less than a century (from 911 settlement to no later than the
first quarter of the eleventh). However, the Normans continued to have a
consciousness as a people of Scandinavian descent for at least two
centuries after that.
I'd suspect a similar process amongst the Gothic rulers of Spain & Italy.
OSCAR HERRERA wrote:
> --- faltin2001 <d.faltin@...> wrote:
>> it should stand as unclear dirk....when the goths
> invaded spain it contends that they drove out other enemys there which
> included the roman legions there and others, etc....oscar
>> Hi Oscar,
>> are the many question marks an expression of disbelief or a sign that you
>> are unclear about the content of my comment?
>> Just to clarify, there is really no doubt today that
>> the Visigoths who settled in Spain after 507 didn't speak Gothic, but
>> Latin or
>> better a Latin military pidgin that included Germanic terms. The fact
>> that all royal documents issued by Visigothic kings are in Latin shouldn't
>> surprise. The same is true for Italy. Yet, even in private and Arian
>> church documents there is no use and not even a reference to an other
>> language, let alone Gothic. In Italy at least some private and clerical
>> documents use Gothic, albeit in a static, archic and formulaic way that
>> shows that the language was more or less dead already in daily use.
>> Also, like in Italy, Visigothic kings never seem to
>> have need for interpreters. They can speak freely communicated with the
>> natives, which would at least require them to have been bilingual.
>> the Frankish Tabula Gentes of 550 AD suggests directly that the Visigoths
>> of Spain were Latin-speakers.
>> I suppose the federate army under Wallia who entered
>> Spain in the
>> early 5th century would have been mostly Gothic/Germanic speaking.
>> Yet, in the subsequent 3 or 4 generations in Gaul
>> Gothic was no doubt
>> abandoned in favour of Latin. When the Gothic kingdom was destroyed by the
>> Franks in 507, the remaining refugees who
>> fled to Spain would have ben Latin/Romanic speakers. And again, the
>> documentary evidence of the subsequent decades allows for no other
>> --- In email@example.com, OSCAR HERRERA
>> <duke.co@...> wrote:
>>> faltin2001 <d.faltin@...> wrote: --- In
>> gothic- firstname.lastname@example.org, "Abdoer-Ragmaan Lombard"
>>> <manielombard@> wrote:
>>>> Perhaps I've used an unsuitable font, so here a
>>>> Could Tulaytula, the Arabic form of Toledo, have
>>>> been derived from *Tôlêtula", a Gothic
>> hypocorism of *Tôlêtô < Latin
>>>> Tôlêtum? Perhaps *Taúlêtô should be regarded as
>> the Gothic etymon
>>>> (long unstressed "ô" having merged in Vulgar
>> Latin with
>> short /o/,
>>>> seeing that Arabic uses a short "u" preceded by
>> an emphatic t, in
>>>> order to reproduce an "o"; long "ê" is given as
>> "ay" [= "ê" in
>>>> Arabic]), which would give *Taúlêtula.
>>> I don't think so, because the Goths in Spain
>> didn't speak Gothic, but
>>> Latin or some vulgar Latin with a few
>> Germanic/Gothic remnants. The
>>> Tabula gentes of about 550AD suggests so, and
>> there is no hint that
>>> they had any difficulties communicating with the
>> local population in
>>> Romanic without interpretors.There is also no
>> indication that written
>>> Gothic was used in Gaul or Spain. After all, the
>> Goths in Gaul and
>>> Spain were a Roman federate army, which also
>> included many Roman
>>> provincials and Latin was no doubt the lingua
>> franca of the various
>>> western Gothic groups since the 5th century.
I'm afraid your email formatting is screwed up and I can't reply
below. The map shows dense concentrations of Germanic place-names in
the far northwest, i.e. the Swabisk area, a local concentration in
northern Catalonia, and few elsewhere. I think this shows that they
are better at identifying West-Germanic place-names than East-
Germanic ones, and nothing else.
On Jul 18, 2007, at 4:39 PM, Rydwlf wrote:
> Hi there,
> I have the feeling that the issue of Spanish toponimes of germanic
> origin has been debated some time in the past in this same list. I
> am sure about the germanic (specially gothic) origin of some
> settlements, mostly villages (that still retain the name). There is
> a high number of examples.
> I have done some research with Google but all the information I
> find is quite fragmentary. Anyway if you're interested I can try to
> give a list of webpages dealing with the issue (and mentioning
> quite a lot of examples), and some book references.
> Figure 15 in the following page can give a rough idea of the
> distribution of toponimes of germanic origin in Iberia.
> Unfortunately I cannot quote the sources, but the author probably
> does so in some page of his work (sorry but I'm short of time today).
> Hope it helps,
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]