[gothic-l] Re: Eruli
- ket-@... (keth) wrote:
Bertil, Keth and others,
I have to tell you that I saw something interesting on the library two
weeks ago. I also have reserve the possibility that Bertil already
mentioned this book.I have been waiting for a opportunity to tell you
about it. On the department for ancient norse/nordic mythology and
saga, Hcedca, I saw a book called:"Götrik och Rolfs saga" by Gunnel and
Göran Liljenroth. On the page;127, you can see a old photostatpicture
of some wooden clubs, under the picture it says that they have been in
use many years ago. These clubs had been in use a long time ago and
after this been preserved in Skatelöv church, and other parishes
churches in Värend. These had been used ackording to the legend, to put
elderly to eternal sleep, who choosed voluntarily to do so. I suppose
that this is not a 19th c adjustment to the herulic legend?
I just happened to remember what Bertil told about the heruls ackording
to antique writers. So Bertil and Keth, I would be happy if you could
tell me if there is anybody else but Procopius, that mentions them.
> Well, well, Bertil, :)
> >The philological part was written by G. Neumann:
> >"Der Name dieses ostgerm. Ethnos
> >erscheint bei ant. Autoren seit dem 3. Jh n Chr....
> >Eruli...is am besten bezeugt. Das in der
> >Ueberlieferung gelegentlich auftauchende H im
> >Wortanfang ist unetym."
> Die Frage war doch, ob Prokop es nicht mit H schreibt.
> Es wäre auch nicht uninteressant etwas über die Methode
> zu vernehmen die zu dieser Schlußfolgerung führte.
> Wurden, zum Beispiel, die "Erilar" Runeninschriften mit
> im Bezug genommen?
> >(The name of this East Germanic people
> >appears in the writings of classical
> >authors since the 3rd Century AD...Eruli...is
> >the best related. The H in the transmission in
> ^^^^ ^^^^^^^
> maybe "the best attested"?
> >the beginning of the word is unetymological."
> If it is "unetymological", then the person who says so
> must know what the etymology is. It then seems legitimate
> to ask what the etymology is.
- --- In email@example.com, "lindarichters
<lindarichters@y...>" <lindarichters@y...> wrote:
#### Hi Linda.
The subject has been discussed a lot. I will answer you very briefly
on Germanic-L, as I dont think the moderator there will object to
that. As for your two questions then I was responding to remarks
made by Dirk. Apart from that I want to say politely that I feel
that it is not yours to decide what is discussed on Gothic-L.
Best regards Einar #####
> > Naturally there were no Heruli existing in the 9th and 10th
> centuries when Iceland was settled so therefore there were no
> among the settlers. But among the settlers there were powerfulhave
> aristocratic families presumably of Swedish descent that could
> been the descendants of aristocratic Heruli families.phrases
> As this position is entirely unfounded, the use of words and
> like "presumably" and "could have been" is in order. The consensusof
> both ancient writers and modern scholarly opinion have establishedA
> Norway as the overwhelming place of origin for both Icelanders and
> Faroe Islanders (see Book of Settlements and related scholarship).
> more relevant question for a Gothic list might be: where did theOrigin
> Goths originate?
> > There can be put forward rather extensive argumentation for this
> hypothesis and these arguments are presented in the book "The
> of the Icelanders", which is the English version. The translationa
> was made by professor Lee M. Hollander at the University of Texas
> How does this relate to the historical East Germanic people known
> the Goths?
> Linda Richters