Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Re: quack

Expand Messages
  • Mike Leavitt
    Hello ernststrohregenmantelrad ... I agree with you, but then are we ducking the issue. :-) Regards -- Mike Leavitt ac998@lafn.org
    Message 1 of 3 , Feb 19, 2003
    • 0 Attachment
      Hello ernststrohregenmantelrad

      On 18-Feb-03, you wrote:

      >> --- In gnosticism2@yahoogroups.com, "Gerry" <gerryhsp@y...>
      > wrote:
      >>
      >> Reply to Ernst's post #7192:
      >>
      >>>> What do you think? Gerry? (I know you are shaking your
      > head and sighing)<<
      >>
      >>
      >>
      >> Looks like both you AND Cari were able to make out my >>>>>
      >> audible "tsk tsk" over that one. Since you asked anyway, I'd >>
      >> refer you to Cari's post #7194, but something tells me that that
      >> approach may not work.
      >
      > Ok,
      >
      > Since this topic has been heading the way of the realm of
      > linguistics and that is the out of scope in group. I will answer to
      > your post privelty or in another fourm. Needless to say the topic
      > of linguistics might be connected with Gnosticism (especially in
      > connation to metaphor) but I feel this topic is not.

      I agree with you, but then are we ducking the issue. :-)

      Regards
      --
      Mike Leavitt ac998@...
    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.