Re: Resonating scripture
- --- In email@example.com, "blackfire_al
<blackfire_al@y...>" <blackfire_al@y...> wrote:
> Well, Gerry, and Cari and Mike and anybody else, there has been an
> ongoing dicussion over at Philosophia2 concerning "conditional
> verses "unconditional love", and can there even be such a thing asand
> unconditional love between us puny humans, with people coming out
> arguing both sides.Thanks for the heads-up, Blackfire. I'll have to check it out.
> But you dicussion of love over here concerns God (the big one, waycourse,
> out there; as opposed to the local one, here and now, who, of
> is carrying a false claim)Aww, who would expect anything less when perfect things are thrust
> Oh well, it's all so confusing....
into an imperfect situation? As for the discussions here and there,
perhaps they shouldn't seem so different after all. If we recognize
the presence of "the big one" within "the local one," then why the
need for us to divvy up and qualify the love we share?
> Because moving away from Latin as the scholars' lingua francaOthers would argue that the movement INTO Latin as the
> was the greatest error throughout the history of European culture.
> This has already been noted by A. Schopenhauer.
scholar's "lingua franca" was the greatest mistake of western
culture... this would include the Greek-speaking composers of much of
the Nag Hammadi library, as well as it's Coptic speaking translators.
Often times both of these languages were very specifically used as
outposts of resistance against Latin cultural oppression. In northern
Egypt the Greek speaking community was second only to the Jews for
their reputation for insurrection (in Alexandria the Greek community
lived just to the south of the walled Jewish quarter, and the
cultural exchange equalled the resentment of occupation. This is the
venue in which Gnosticism was created).
None of these books we are talking about were written in Latin, so
gumming up the works with yet a fourth (unrelated) language in the
mix seemed rather strange is all. Don't get me wrong, Latin is a
wonderful language, and one that is very useful to the scientific
community. It is also something like speaking Hebrew at a Palistinian
knitting club. I have no problem if you want to use latin... knock
yourself out our uptight friend. Now, if we were talking about
Catholicism it would seem perfectly obvious that you should use Latin.
By the way..... Schopenhauer wasn't Gnostic either.