Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Re: Trichotomy

Expand Messages
  • TerjeDB
    Well, I for one *know where the notion of the Alliance are coming from* when they refer to trichotomy i.e. the concept of triparite human nature <It
    Message 1 of 1 , Nov 29, 2001
    • 0 Attachment
      Well, I for one *know where the notion of the
      "Alliance" are coming from* when they refer
      to<br>"trichotomy" i.e. the concept of triparite human nature <It
      should be noted that the author betrays his confusion of
      terms already in the beginning when he upholds
      "biblical" and "historical" "presedence" (hah!) for a
      "two-fold" nature - this dual human nature he defines by the
      *genders*, or at least, *the genders he knows about* (sic!);
      the "tradition" which performed the unpardonable
      "sin" or "heresy" of Triparition of human nature does
      not refer to humanity as a whole, but to the single
      unit - namely, The Man; theirs were a concern of
      Anthropology - or the study of human nature. He is
      tendentially confusing the consensus view of "humanity" being
      divided *by two* - i.e. between genders, which equals a
      consideration of the surface - namely that every advanced
      lifeform multiplies by the union of two individuals of
      different genders - with the philosophical consideration of
      what the single individual is composite of. In effect,
      here he does not make sense. However, the concern of
      modern day conservatives within Christendom - are
      concerned about the former issue - with which the
      "threefold human nature" has nothing whatsoever to do;
      namely - Mankind "obey" and "pay tribute and
      glorification" to the creator who designed "the man" as such "To
      Man and Woman" (ref. Gen 1CH) - by multiplying the
      mass of worshippers and lyal subjects - in accordance
      with "historical presedence" indeed; however, ours is
      different times - and Biology,Science and apperently the
      Times - challenge the presedence with both hypothetical
      and practical *evidence* that.. it aint necessarely
      so; The union of the two genders are not necessary in
      a *practical sense* in order to produce a new human
      being, Man may well function - in either of the
      categories i.e. the genders without subscribing to the
      historical presedence; he or she may consider themselves
      fully humane although they are physically incapable,
      alone or with their partner - to produce offspring..
      Their reason to *exist* no longer depends on
      reproduction.. this has affected the worldview,choices and
      directions of generations.. and threatens the Theologies
      that use the World as evidence of God�s mental health
      and benevolence towards mankind.. <br><br>But this
      isn�t because of a conspiracy - and whatever worldview
      which reflects upon different answers to the same
      problem, the same riddle - does not threaten the
      historical presedence and the choice of our ancestors...The
      moment Now, the status quo.. reality whether you like it
      or not.. threatens this historical presendence..
    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.