Re: Hello All
- Hi Guy
I hope nobody minds my responding to an old post.
I do understand your aversion to arguments, but perhaps you would be
willing to engage in civil discussion that may involve disagreement?
If so, I'm interested in how you would define "sin".
--- In firstname.lastname@example.org, "isis_powered" <isis_powered@...>
> Finally I'm in a Gnostic discussion site. Over many years of
> spiritual work I've gradually came to views and realizations thatare
> almost exactly as are found in Gnosticism and Manichaeism. Butsay
> whenever I try to discuss them all people do is argue with me and
> that isn't true. I have even referred to articles in theway
> encyclopedia and books written on it that shows that this is the
> Gnostics is and I'm not making all this up.taught
> But the most important thing of all is that I just don't believe
> these things, I actually walk the path. I quoted St. Paul
> saying, "5:21 Prove all things; hold fast that which is good." And
> so to me all those thoughts and justifications for tolerating sin I
> take as a bad thing, and the path that leads away from sin, as
> in Gnosticism and for the same reasons, is good. And thereforethis
> saying of Paul proves that the path that leads away from sin isme
> better then all the Christian beliefs and justifications that
> justifies sin. On this point all people want to do is argue with
> and wont let me get beyond this point. I guess I was just in the
> wrong bulletin board, I wish I would of started here in the first
> place, the Gnostic corner of the Internet.
> So greetings all.
- In a message dated 1/4/2008 6:09:06 A.M. Eastern Standard Time, souldreamone@... writes:
aversion to arguments-------Why would anyone be averse to argument? How else can one learn or solve the unknown?thea
- In a message dated 1/4/2008 5:09:11 AM Pacific Standard Time, theoj678@... writes:
aversion to arguments-------Why would anyone be averse to argument? How else can one learn or solve the unknown?theaGuy's original post implied he was frustrated by the sort of closed argumentation in which there is no real listening or further communication. When one introduces oneself to a forum in that way, it may indicate an aversion to any argument, so I extended the courtesy of asking if it was okay to discuss.Phil
- In a message dated 1/4/2008 3:41:58 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, souldreamone@... writes:if it was okay to discuss.-------------Discusion is great at a party or about the weather; however, it would seem that one needs controversies to reach beyond an unknown to learn. JMHOthea
- In a message dated 1/4/2008 1:08:59 PM Pacific Standard Time, theoj678@... writes:In a message dated 1/4/2008 3:41:58 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, souldreamone@... writes:if it was okay to discuss.-------------Discusion is great at a party or about the weather; however, it would seem that one needs controversies to reach beyond an unknown to learn. JMHOtheaI believe you're right about that. Agreement may be comfy, but it seems to put us to sleep. It seems to me that all movement is through tension. The tension of desire is the movement of experience. Physical tension leads to movement. The tension of problems leads to creative solutions. The tension of suffering often leads to transcendence. So, tension was never a problem, it's the resistance to the 'movement' that becomes struggle. Tension....in-tense....intention. Hmmmmm.....thanks for helping create the tension so's I could notice that. Hehe.Phil