Re: New Member
- --- In firstname.lastname@example.org, lady_caritas <no_reply@...> wrote:
>To back up a second, Gerry, a question one might ask is whether
> --- In email@example.com, "Gerry" <gerryhsp@> wrote:
> > I don't know if anyone is up for a little challenge, but I've been
> > patiently waiting for somebody to notice something. Just over one
> > ago, PMCV quoted a passage from the GPh
> > <http://www.gnosis.org/naghamm/gop.html> in his response to a
> > member. The verse he selected came from the Gnosis Archives, and
> > Isenberg's translation there is an accurate rendering of the Coptic
> > original.
Isenberg's is the only acceptable rendering or whether there are other
viable translations that could hold up as well.
--- In firstname.lastname@example.org, "janahooks" <janahooks@...> wrote:
> [. . .]
> Gerry and Lady C.,thanks for all of the info and links.
Thank you, Jana, for noticing them.
> Gerry, after looking at the National Geographic link, I was
> reminded of some suggestions I gave you on faded writing. I'm feeling
> really good about watery sepia ink and sandpaper...and sand
> horizontally and vertically...with the gray sandpaper...
And ya know, that was the one suggestion you wrote me that I was the most hesitant to attempt. There's something about the dual-layered papyrus and its almost glossy sheen that made me wonder if such coarse measures would destroy the whole thing, but the more I've thought about it (along with your renewed convictions), the more I believe it would indeed yield a desirable finish. I imagine the weathered results would be akin to repeatedly wadding up a sheet of paper to the point that it becomes more like a thin piece of cloth rather than a crisp piece of paper. Only this way, you avoid the wrinkles!