13079Re: Tillich and the Demiurge
- Aug 11 7:02 PMIt appears that others have also made this connection between Tillich
and his idea of "a God beyond God" with the Gnostic understanding of
"Some of the Gnostic views of cosmology were different than both
Jewish and Christian traditional interpretations. Like Paul Tillich,
they asked the question is there a "God beyond God"? So in their
attempt to define or explain evil , they said there was a more
perfect God than the one who created and observes all the evil on
earth. Is our God too small? Maybe as Tillich questioned there is a
God beyond the God we create."
The Genesis Factor, by Stephan A. Hoeller
"While the concept of two Gods is horrifying to the monotheistically
conditioned mind, it is not illogical or improbable. Modem
theologians, particularly Paul Tillich, have boldly referred to "the
God above God." Tillich introduced the term "ground of being" as
alternative language to express the divine. The ideas of the old
Gnostics seem not so outdated after all."
It also seems that even during Tillich's lifetime he was accused of
being a "modern Gnostic" and did his best to refute this.
--- In firstname.lastname@example.org, "Mark" <larockpitts@...> wrote:
> Paul Tillich (1868-1965), a liberal Christian theologian, felt that
> concept of a "Personal God" as held by many main-line Christians
> concept that destroyed any meaningful idea of God. Instead, he
> of a "God" that was above this personal God, a "God above God,"
> he understood as the "Ground of Being." Since all language, when
> comes to describing God, is metaphorical and reflects the culture
> which it arose, I am wondering if Tillich--not intentionally or
> consciously--is merely restating, in the philosophical/theological
> idiom of his day, the Gnostic teaching, expressed in the
> philosophical/theological idiom of their day, of the God that is
> behind/above the creator God/Demiurge. I don't think Tillich
> called this "Personal God" evil, but he did see it as limiting and
> destructive to spirituality--a God that we had to "get beyond" to
> the true God.
> Also, thank you Cari for your thoughtful answer to my previous post-
> the three levels of initiation and their correlation to the temple
> very interesting.
- << Previous post in topic Next post in topic >>