Sallie Chisholm's Procholorococcus.
"We participated in three expeditions that tested this hypothesis,
which a patch of ocean was fertilized with iron, and the response of
the phytoplankton community was monitored. The results were
Phytoplankton biomass increased 20-fold with the addition of iron,
and the structure of the phytoplankton community also changed
substantially. Our role in the project was to describe and understand
the differential response of phytoplankton species to iron
There is an interesting aspect of iron, no? It's conductive!
How big is this discussion? Isaac Asomov has a book on "history"
going back to the Big Bang. As of 1992 when this book was published,
on the subject of pre cellular life--he had no answer (the
scientific community HAD no answer). I am answering it before your
eyes, and you are corresponding with someone who will be remembered
hundreds of years, perhaps, after my death, because of it. Kindof
The answer, again, is in cirrus clouds. The reason there is a
difference between surface algae Sallie Chisholm discusses in the
above link and in Sci Am this month, page 52-3, and the deeper algae
is explained in this way. Nucleotide parasols must alter a movement
between ionosphere and conductive, field from convection charged
cloud tops, and in the oceans below, later, cellular life in
cummulations altered the conductivity of the oceans. Different role,
but symbiotically related.
Clouds are forced ELECTRICALLY!!!! Think IRON might be important in
this? Dah! Meanwhile, also at MIT is Professor Lindzen, who is chain
smoking and cannot explain to himself, or the President, what is the
mechanism behind the 'iris'. Ask yourself, why is Lindzen and the
other climatologists so out of touch? And I don't think it is
because they didn't know that iron was conductive--they have known
all along about iron firtilizers and algaes and CO2 sinking . . .