Re: Just remember, GW is nonsense.
- There may be no evidence to suggest that the
earth warming is due to man's use of fossil
fuels.<br>Likewise there is no evidence to prove that it is not
responsible. So do we sit back and site a lack of definitive
evidence as good reason to continue along our current
path?<br><br>If on the grounds of the evidence that you cite, we
decide to continue to pollute our atmosphere.<br>What
happens if we later find that the use of fossil fuels is
responsible for destroying our atmosphere and science cannot
find a way to fix the problem?<br><br>I would much
rather assume that the use of fossil fuels IS destroying
our atmosphere and push towards the use of cleaner
energy sources. Can you see any problems with this
course of action?<br><br>Kind Regards<br>natureguy_au
- This group started in 1999 and got its first posting on volcanos in
2001. BUT you got nothing nada on the underwater volcano that
erupted or formed off Oregon Coast.
Let me check if you got anything on NOAA.
--- In email@example.com, shotsky1 wrote:
> This is an interesting article which describes
> the difficulty encountered in recreating a
> temperature profile over the last century. Of course the
> temperature profile is how we determine whether, and how
> much, the global climate is changing. Very interesting
br><br>Summary:<br>The records of annual global surface temperature
> anomalies and their regional distribution are not
> explicable by a theory of steady almost uniform global
> temperature increase, such as the supposed effects of
> increases in greenhouse gases. The surface temperature
> behaviour is much more readily explained by local effects,
> particularly heating, which can take place in both urban and
> rural sites, and is most likely in cold locations.
> <br><br>The MSU satellite temperature records of the lower
> troposphere detect important climate effects also evident in
> the surface record, such as those of volcanos, ocean
> circulation (El Niño, and ocean cooling) and the sun. They do
> not detect, however the regional hotspots which are
> largely responsible for the rise in surface temperature.
> The differences between the surface temperature
> record since 1978 and that recorded by the MSU
> satellites in the lower troposphere must therefore be
> largely due to local heating which is highly regional,
> and is particularly evident in cold climates.