Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Re: [genpcncfir] Moore

Expand Messages
  • cheryl rhoden
    The problem with this record is that the Moore DNA project seems to dispute that Caleb Moore was the son of the John Moore that married Hardeman. He was the
    Message 1 of 6 , May 10, 2010
    • 0 Attachment
      The problem with this record is that the Moore DNA project seems to dispute that Caleb Moore was the son of the John Moore that married Hardeman. He was the son of "a John Moore" according to a family bible ,, just not the son of John Moore that married Hardeman.
      best, Cheryl




      ________________________________
      From: Paula Baker <paulabaker69@...>
      To: Jewelle List <genpcncfir@yahoogroups.com>
      Sent: Mon, May 10, 2010 7:42:34 PM
      Subject: [genpcncfir] Moore

       
      http://familytreema ker.genealogy. com/users/ s/i/r/James- L-Sirmans- Hamilton/ WEBSITE-0001/ UHP-0156. html

      Sent from my iPhone







      [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
    • Paula Baker
      http://www.stanford.edu/~moore/Moore.pdf Can t remember what I sent. Forgive repetition. Sent from my iPhone On May 11, 2010, at 12:44 PM, cheryl rhoden
      Message 2 of 6 , May 11, 2010
      • 0 Attachment
        http://www.stanford.edu/~moore/Moore.pdf

        Can't remember what I sent. Forgive repetition.

        Sent from my iPhone

        On May 11, 2010, at 12:44 PM, cheryl rhoden <rhodenccc@...> wrote:

        1827 Mecklenberg. And a Patsy Portice in 1831 Surrey.
      Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.