Re: a gay nation, another point....
- Donald, blood does not have to be shed, the Coral Sea Islands were
chosen by the Gay activists because they are an uninhabited external
territory/colony of Australia. This means under international law
and the Charter of the United Nations and the Constituion of
Australia as an External Overseas Territory the UN Law of "All
external Territories have a right to self government and self
determination" applies. The Coral Sea Islands as a territory has
the same legal standing in the world as say Gibralter does to
England or Tahiti does to France and under International law must be
allowed to Self determine, it has its own United Nations country
code of CR and is intitled to its own top level domain if it becomes
inhapited. So the Aussies gays and lesbians who raised the rainbow
flaf there were certainly onto something
--- In email@example.com, Donald Kirby <kndmgck@y...> wrote:
> Not only is the problem momentum, but aversion to real action. No
land is avalible unless taken; and no political bodie willingly
gives up any power, be it people, land or otherwise. The only way
to achieve and maintain a seperate nation for a homeland is if
people are willing to fight for it. Any group that is oppressed
cannot achieve freedom until they are willing to shed blood-not
just theirs but that of others as well, Until the GLBT community is
ready to do as the founding fathers of almost every other nation
on earth did no "GLBT Homeland" will ever exist. WE-as a whole- can
whine and pout and cry and try to use courts and polititians(most
of which are corrupt or imbeciles) and achieve nothing- or WE can
pick a spot, settle there, and fight for what we want. History has
shown that such things have one price: blood. Ours and theirs. Even
the followers of the Blessed Ghandi shed their own blood. But we
who speak of a gay homeland don't want a homeland bad enough to
> such a thing. It might muss our hair.
> Does this sound a little militaristic? It should. It is
reality, it is history, it is the Truth.
> Viktor Zimmermann <viktor.zimmermann@g...> wrote: Steff,
> you rise a topic which probably many wanted to stir but never
> The very idea of a queer nation is much older than is generally
> believed, and there were always less or more active phases in
> development of this idea. There are many conceptions existing:
> hate straights" to "Gay Parallel Republic" and of course the one-
> show of Mr. Anderson. Search for "Queer nationalism" on Google
> will certainly find some interesting articles.
> Well, to answer your question - I must tell you, that most
> the gay nationalism movement seem somewhat uncertain about what
> next now. You see, the idea is that much high-flown that most
> are very euphoric in the first days/weeks, but they let their
> drop when some real things have to be done - e.g. signing of
> documents for registration, paying membership dues or simply
> participating in some tiresome debates. Whenever something real
> be done, we loose faith and hide in corners, waiting for
> making the next step.
> Most of us seem unable to overcome past differences and are
> our ego-centrism. Even if history has proved that our opponents
> right, we cannot make a step towards them and acknowledge our
> misjudgment. It's not the "us against them" matter, fellows:
> about the ability to accept differences of political views. If
> could find a way to communicate to eachother directly and not
> our lawyers, it would be a small, but important progress.
> However, this movement is certainly not dead. Whereas I suppose
> the remains of Kingdom's government are also planning some re-
> organization, it's not the only place in the world to discuss
> self-determination. You might find it interesting to peer into
> "Gay Homeland" discussion group as well:
> There we are discussing some aspects of gay nationalism as such,
> independently from the republican/monarchist mindstate. The
> open to anybody intersted in the gay life and is not strictly
> only republican supporters.
> I hope that this message will be not understood as an unfriendly
> attempt to draw subscribers of this group into our own forum.
> just a hand, stretched out to this group and all actively
> in the discussion, inclusively the moderators/government.
> We must recognize that all previous efforts obviously HAVE
> we are in need of a serious discussion before we start a next
> What do we want to achieve at the long-term, what can we achieve
> within the next few years? It obviously does NOT suffice
> independency" and choose an island on the map to be regarded as
> Come back to Earth, buddies, leave the sulling corner and let's
> about the enterprise like grown-ups.
> Viktor Zimmermann
> SPONSORED LINKS
> Sea island
real estate Sea island
ga United nation
Sea island hotel
Sea island inn Sea island
> YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
> Visit your group "gaykingdom" on the web.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
> Yahoo! Photos Showcase holiday pictures in hardcover
> Photo Books. You design it and we'll bind it!
- Dear Sally,
what's your definition for "troublemaker"? If this is somebody who is
asking too many questions, which other people are unwilling to answer
honestly, so yes - I am. I love asking questions.
Indeed, upon I began asking questions, some other people began to do
alike. The answers were not satisfying - you can't seriously blame ME
for this? The "gayrepublic group" was formed by individuals, who have
left this group by free pieces anyway, or were urged to leave. I never
was telling the world anything more, than Mr. Freeman and Mr. Peréz
are telling now as well (see gaykingdom.org) - just a couple of
monthes earlier. And, if you please, what have I to do with the final
break-up between Mr. Anderson and the rest of his kingdom? No, dear -
it was a logical consequence, and most of the troubles were caused by
Mr. Anderson himself - he proved to be extremely gifted in loosing
trust from many good people, who at beginning took this project
seriously and invested lots of time and work into it.
Now to my own business, upon request. Well, a "recent threat of suing"
from Gunnar? Not at all recent and, no offense - Gunnar talks lot of
things when he is angry. ;D You can ask him if you wish - he is member
of this group. As for "lies and rumor" you should check the "Gayzette"
in this group's file section (with official apologize from "HIM Dale"
for fraudulent pictures on the old website), as well as the new
gaykingdom.org website - obviously, in the meanwhile Dale is the only
one who believes the very fairytales he told us 1 year ago. Our
website was changed 3 monthes after the conflict with Dale and this
occasion had nothing to do with him or his "legal actions". I hope
Generally, it is nothing dishonest or compromizing to be sued by
certain people - it only indicates that one has crossed their
interests in some way. And, no offense - Dale would have had his
reasons to actually NOT going to the court - his chances to win the
threatend lawsuit were not that good, I guess.
--- In firstname.lastname@example.org, "someonenotfamous"
> Victor, you of all people should practise what you preach!!! You
> were one of the main trouble makers and are one of the people who
> caused much damage to the kingdom and formed the breakaway republic
> group, you then posted lies and rumour on your gat republic web site
> that resulted in HIM Dale taking legal action against you and you
> had to remove the offending information, you have also had to endure
> other legal threats against you by members of your own republic
> group such as Gunther and his recent threat of suing you, so maybe
> you should take a look at yourself before lectuing others.