Re: First Edition, Ultimate Weapons. (Hehe!)
- Dear Listees,
--- In gammaworld@y..., Stephen Patterson <stevep@v...> wrote:
> Clarification rebuttle:
None needed dude, I was *kidding*...
[massive teleport weapon snippage]
> > ...By..? What?? Forcefields..?
> Hm. Uh, no. I didn't finish the sentence. I was thinking of
something more "low tech", in terms of
> pre-Shadow Age technology; like anti-missile batteries (either
disruptors or "smart" anti-missile missiles).
Ahh, as a sort of active defense against theives and vandals,
> A Force Field (in retrospect) seems to be quite reasonable, however,
given that a Portent generates a weak
> Force Field (5 points), and were presumably un-licensed technology
available even for civilians or
> non-military applications of the technology.
Uhhmmm, what's a "Portent"? Otherwise, yes, a "weak" forcefield -
just enough to preserve the item against weathering, that's what I was