Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Re: [fukuoka_farming] Re: Methane & Cattle

Expand Messages
  • Don Graves
    accurate info? ... ....or urban toilet humour? ... & sometimes CRAP information (to use another pun) no offence meant by this... however ...please get it
    Message 1 of 1 , Jul 3, 2002
      accurate info? ...
      ....or urban toilet humour?
      ... & sometimes "CRAP" information (to use another pun)
      no offence meant by this...
      however ...please get it right!!!
      MOST anthopogenic (human activity derived ) methane gas is derived from
      domesticated ruminant animals that BELCH (NOT CRAP) METHANE

      Methane gas is generated by anaeobic methanogenic BACTERIA living inside
      ruminant stomachs
      uncaptured gases emitted from similar BACTERIA in animal & human waste
      treatment oxidation ponds

      I am not advocating for meat production (cattle, sheep, goat, horse or
      quite the contrary ...
      ... there is now serious research funding proposed to help support meat
      producers to modify pasture plant diets of production animals, & or to
      genetically modify or select for gastro-intestinal bacteria (eg. from
      kangaroos / wallabies) that will aim to produce less methane... This sounds
      like crazy control-freak stuff to me..
      just check & read the earth's long history of methanogens & other
      archaebacteria ...
      Methanogenic bacteria existied way way before photosynthetic bacteria, algae
      & plants poisoned the air with oxygen gas ...& forced them to escape & hide
      from oxygen rich environments, & live in anaerobic retreats like wet soils,
      pits & gastro intestinal tracts of insects & larger animals.


      ----- Original Message -----
      From: "blugra" <did_not@...>
      To: <fukuoka_farming@yahoogroups.com>
      Sent: Wednesday, July 03, 2002 6:14 PM
      Subject: [fukuoka_farming] Re: Cattle

      > I will post an email from another group I subscribe to, which is why the
      subject was on my mind. I thought it a pretty clear outline of the problems
      and I know from my reading that it is accurate.
      > The situation is yes we are overpopulated and as a result cattle and other
      grazing animals are also but they are not inseperably linked. There are
      cultures which abstain or eat minimal amounts of meat over many generations.
      Meat eating is not vital to human existence. Therefore the number of cattle
      is a factor of consumer demand and appetite.
      > No matter how you cut it, (sorry bad pun) meat eating is still a major
      environmentally related decision. There are ways to solve the problems and
      yes grass fed beef is one of them. But unless we cut consumption way down
      there is no way to grass feed the numbers we are dealing with at this
      > One of the reasons this is a hot point for me is I was raised in the rural
      midwest which used to be small farms and now my home area is wall to wall
      cattle in feed lots standing in their own excrement with a stink for miles.
      Not to mention the pollution of the water, or the massive slaughterhouse and
      packing plant and its obnoxiousness. I never preached vegetarianism to my
      kids but one trip to visit the grandparents and they understood.
      > *******
      > Cattle are one of the biggest problems on the planet. Fer starters,
      > most of the Amazon rain forest is being burned away simply to provide
      > cattle graze. It's the single largest reason for the depletion of the
      > rain forests of the world. Cattle, as a food product, take HUGE
      > amounts of land to produce a pound of protein compared to producing
      > that same pound of protein from plant sources -- I don't remember the
      > ratio, but it's staggering. [added note from Blu...its about 1 to 10, it
      takes 10 times as much water to raise a lb of beef as that of grain protein]
      > Methane, including, specifically, methane from cattle crap (I can
      > already hear you laughing <G>) is one of the major contributors to the
      > reduction of the ozone layer. As much or MORE than industrial and
      > automotive effluents. (There are other methane sources, including
      > volcanic emission and the melting of methane-containing deposits on
      > the ocean floor because of the global warming of ocean currents, that
      > are also chiming in on the methane problem...) The problem with
      > flourocarbons from hair sprays is teeeny by comparison.
      > Processing cattle into meat, and then processing the rest of cattle
      > into leather and other products utilizes some extremely caustic and
      > carcinogenic compounds, most of which work their way from processing
      > plants into the air and water supplies.
      > I dunno if you've ever been associated with a packing plant, but
      > you'll find that the blood products alone will actually eat away
      > epoxy/cement floors in months. Processing plants are constantly
      > replacing their floors and pipes. It kept my grandfather, a master
      > plumber, in business most of his life.
      > Tanning leather is a really nasty business chemically. Some of the
      > compounds used are right on the top of the hit lists of serious
      > chemical pollutants.
      > Taken as a whole, cattle and the cattle-related businesses are
      > probably one of the biggest pollution problems on the planet, and it's
      > getting to be a larger problem as more third-world countries develop a
      > taste for beef.
      > Okay, that's the last I'm going to rail on that subject <G>. If you
      > want more information, there are a bunch of good websites that will go
      > into further detail.
      > david
      > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
      > fukuoka_farming-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
      > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.