RE: [fukuoka_farming] Re: economic approach
- It is true that fertilizer has no part in natural farming but we have also
had many discussions on this list about the fortune of some to slowly build
their natural farm while living on the money of other employment and at the
same time, looking down on those who are farming artificially but are simply
doing what they can and what they know in order to survive.
This move by the government of Malawi does mean improved profits for large
multinational fertilizer companies but on the other hand it means survival
of the people. And dependence on themselves not on aid. And a movement away
from destructive world bank globalization policies of growing cash crops for
export and back to growing food for the people of Malawi. Now they just need
to learn how to do it better!
Does anyone believe throwing seedballs is an option for destitute starving
people? Or waiting for the land to naturally regenerate/re-vegetate. Fukuoka
farming is a goal for these people but right now they need options that feed
them THIS YEAR. Now is the time for education and change. Those of us with
knowledge of another way now have our chance. If you read the article -
the subsidies have been reduced and many people are not getting them this
year. The children and elderly have first access in the village they
discussed. These other farmers will not have the money to buy the same
amount of fertilizer and thus may be open to organic methods that can offer
true living food.
Tell me what you would do if you needed to rescue your country from
starvation and poverty in ONE year. It is an incredible achievement. Organic
farming of any kind requires huge levels of education and is a long term
solution one that can now be tackled since the base problem of starvation
has been addressed.
We have had posts about all sorts of completely unsustainable products being
used as soil additives including soy meal (which may or may not contain GE
organisms) and many others. These posts have been applauded for their vegan
suitability but are also not available to those without cash. Superphosphate
is generally phosphate rock with acid added so the rock breaks down faster.
Its not good but it grows food of some level and when you have no knowledge
of another way what can you do.
PLEASE DO NOT GET ME WRONG. I have never used chemical fertilizer and never
will. I am not advocating the use of chemical fertilizers. But I do feel it
is very arrogant to suggest that wealthy westerners should be asserting our
ideals on a country of malnourished people. Unless you personally are over
there educating and providing food in the FIRST YEAR then I do not feel it
is correct to challenge a system that offers life, at whatever level.
Now this man Shripad A. Dabholkar has a way of providing food in one
season using common waste
http://shourie.bharatvani.org/articles/19970705.htm and incredible yields at
that. His book Plenty for All is available through Other India bookstore,
as is R.T. Doshi who uses Dabholkars method for city farming with huge
success. And this tree Moringa oleifera -
http://treesforlife.org/project/moringa/default.en.asp has the potential to
save peoples lives as it is so incredibly nutritious, can purify water etc.
These are natural short term options - but natural farming its long term.
Instead of being offended - take the article as a challenge. Here is an
opportunity to help. Find a Malawi blog or website and contribute thoughts
of natural farming to it. Do something positive to help them move them into
a future of real food.
[mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org] On Behalf Of brunohenrileroy
Sent: Tuesday, 4 December 2007 3:50 AM
Subject: [fukuoka_farming] Re: economic approach
I am french living in Madagascar, and simply a vegetable grower and
gardener. I have just read the article you sent but i have not
understood what it is doing on this yahoo group?
Are you trying to tell us that fertilizer is the best way to end famine?
If that is so, please start reading Mr Fukuoka's book "la révolution
d'un seul brin de paille", you will find it cheap at the FNAC in Paris.
If you had not noticed, we are all, on this fukuoka group, getting rid
of chemicals and plowing. The article you sent has no place here!
Maybe you made a mistake and wanted to send it somewhere else?
If you sent it intentionnally, I am sorry to say that no one here will
follow your advice.
Please feel free to reply but, even if we are not shut to other ways
of cultivating the earth, this one you sent is definitely out of the
--- In email@example.com
<mailto:fukuoka_farming%40yahoogroups.com> , Robert Monie <bobm20001@...>
>sustainable, or even organic farming. All it says is that when the
> Hi Barbie,
> I'm puzzled as to what this article has to do with natural,
people of Malawi couldn't get fertilizer, they couldn't grow much, and
now that the Malawi government is making fertilizer widely available
by subsidies, the local farmers are growing more food crops. No
mention of cover crops, forest farming, dynamic nutrient accumulators,
humus-building perennial grass and forb lays, or nitrogen-fixing
plants--just an ill-defined category, "fertilizer."
> Bob Monie
> New Orleans, La
> Barbié olivier <olivierbarbie@...> wrote:
> When the economic approach of the food production start to
>couleurs - découvrez la démo !
> Olivier Barbié
> Tel. : 06 18 76 67 27
> Professeur agrégé
> IUT de Cachan, Paris XI
> Département GEii1
> 9 Av de la division Leclerc
> 94234 CACHAN
> Laboratoire PHARE
> Université de Paris I Panthéon Sorbonne
> Maison des Sciences Economiques
> 106-112 bd de L'Hôpital
> 75647 Paris Cedex 13
> Yahoo! Mail innove : interface hyper pratique, messenger intégré,
>[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]