Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Re: [fukuoka_farming] "STRATEGY TO COPE WITH FLUCTUATIONS IN COMMODITY PRICES IN ORDER TO GAIN HUGE PROFITS"

Expand Messages
  • Santos Santos
    Regards, Thank you for the positive response according to my idea of carbon trading such as trading commodities trading by calculating the amount of carbon
    Message 1 of 9 , May 18, 2013
    • 0 Attachment
      Regards,

      Thank you for the positive response according to my idea of carbon trading such as trading commodities trading by calculating the amount of carbon that is dilahan including the exit or harvested by farmers. Trading system is done is through the scheme "warehouse receipt" so that supply and demand through securities and may be traded on a "futures market". But the more details you read the first book Rudi Hilmanto or contacting him directly

      This might be a little explanation thank my opinion

      santos


      ________________________________
      From: Alan Sloan <alan851603@...>
      To: "fukuoka_farming@yahoogroups.com" <fukuoka_farming@yahoogroups.com>
      Cc: fukuoka farming <fukuoka_farming@yahoogroups.com>
      Sent: Friday, May 17, 2013 2:00 PM
      Subject: Re: [fukuoka_farming] "STRATEGY TO COPE WITH FLUCTUATIONS IN COMMODITY PRICES IN ORDER TO GAIN HUGE PROFITS"



       
      Im not a specialist lawyer or trader, and the following may be incorrect, but my current understanding is that:

      Technically, or theoretically, if Natural Farmers were able (individually or collectively) to convert large enough areas from tillage to non/tillage, Carbon would be sequestered.

      If that Carbon saving is certified by a recognised body, it is my understanding that trade able credits could be created.

      Unless a large area is involved it is unlikely that any revenue created would exceed the cost of certification. If I am correct (and I'm not at all sure I am) it may be possible to establish a register of established NF systems on a cooperative basis to generate revenue. I am not even sure that it would be possible to calculate the carbon savings on a large number if different plots.

      Alan

      On 17 May 2013, at 07:35, Ruthie Aquino <ruthieaquino1@...> wrote:

      > Greetings,
      > I don't think your concerns are those of natural farming, even if we do try
      > not to suffer losses.
      > Good luck to you.
      > RUTHIE
      >
      >
      > 2013/5/17 Santos Santos <santos_santos1978@...>
      >
      >> **
      >>
      >>
      >> Regards,
      >>
      >> Land management
      >> in the form of farming provides much risk of loss. Forms such losses
      >> primarily
      >> due to face the ups and downs of commodity prices. It is important for
      >> agriculture and forestry watchdog discuss a real concept in addressing this
      >> problem. As a result of these price fluctuations forming the fears of
      >> farmers
      >> and investors doing business in agriculture, fisheries, farming, and
      >> forestry.
      >> I want to show you a concept, method, and the real application to be
      >> discussed
      >> by the members of this group, namely: a strategy to cope with fluctuations
      >> in
      >> commodity prices in order to gain huge profits through regulation of
      >> production
      >> and composition of plants on farms in agriculture, fisheries, plantation,
      >> and
      >> forestry.
      >>
      >> Link:http://staff.unila.ac.id/rudihilmanto/
      >>
      >> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
      >
      >
      > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
      >
      >
      >
      > ------------------------------------
      >
      > Yahoo! Groups Links
      >
      >
      >



      [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.