7035Re: [fukuoka_farming] Re: Chickens???
- Feb 2, 2008Nobody needs to make excuses for including meat in his or
her diet. But I don't believe that heredity or the dietary habits
of one's ancestors necessarily serve to define good life style
patterns for the present or future.
What is significant in the life style of primitive man/woman
on this planet is not that he/she also ate meat but that they
didn't eat anything at all for extended periods of time. And
when a sumptuous meal could be consumed this was done
at the expense of a considerable amount of physical labour.
Today, that has dramatically changed, and our dietary habits
have to change accordingly. The sedentary office worker can
without any labour at all stuff him/her-self with big chunks of
meat from morning till evening. And I have seen too many
overweight men that didn't make it passed their 50th birthday.
If we feel a desire to eat meat, that is not necessarily because
our body sends us subtle messages regarding it's nutritional
needs, that is more often than not on the same level as the craving
for the next cigarette or a bar of chocolate. Now, I hope nobody
will claim that his/her ancestors lived primarily on chocolate.
Garth & Kim Travis <gartht@...> wrote:
You bring up many good points, and I wish I could just let my animals
run, but then they would be in the county lock up, not running free. We
have too many people and all the land is owned. We also have neighbors
that think it is funny when their animals kill yours. Stupid man,
didn't think his dogs would kill his own calves when they were born. I
feel sorry for all his animals, especially his dogs.
I know many people that raise animals for consumption that are doing it
for the same reasons I do, and in much the same way. We go as natural
as possible in a confused world, with strange laws.
While I respect Fukuoka-san, he was Oriental. His heredity was very
different from mine, we all not all the same. His pancreas was probably
twice the size of mine, if our bodies were the same size, due to
hereditary diet. I am aware than many people do very well on a
vegetarian diet, and some on a vegan diet provided they take their pills
for the B vitamins. [I think that is the right one.] I don't eat meat
at every meal, I never sit down to a 16 ounce steak or any other overly
done nonsense. I do eat meat most days, or animal protein. For my body
type, this is good for me and I am much healthier for it. But my
ancestors lived on a diet that was mostly animal protein. My snacks and
at least 2/3 of my meals are vegetables, grains and fruit. I do not
eat processed food at all.
I would urge people to eat clean, naturally raised food that is
compatible with their heredity. A well balanced diet including meat can
be very healthy, if that is what an individuals body needs. If one has
a different heredity than me, of course their body is a bit different.
This is why all blood work comes with ranges that are good, not exact
numbers, our bodies are not exactly the same.
>> i think what fukuoka-san is trying to say is in order to raise natural
> chickens or other fowl, they should not be confined in any way. in
> fact, he wrote
> "if poultry and livestock are to truly benefit man, they must be
> capable of feeding and fending for themselves under the open sky. only
> then will food become naturally plentiful and contribute to man's
> fukuoka-san had chickens and ducks and let them grow up among the
> and grains and revert back to half-wild. when he could no longer keep
> them in that way because of a highway, he stopped keeping them.
> in regard to meat-eating, fukuoka-san wrote of an application his
> friend george ohsawaw had worked out;
> "meat is yang and vegetables yin, with grains in between. because man
> is an omnivorous animal that is yang, this leads to a set of
> principles which says that, when grains, which are intermediate, are
> eaten as the staple, yin vegetables should be consumed and meat (very
> yang)--consumption of which is essentially cannabalism--should be
> yet fukuoka-san was more tolerant and neutral than that. although
> completely or mainly
> vegetarian himself, he did not delve into scientific analysis about
> it, considering such an analysis pointed away from non-active nature
> and into discriminating knowledge. i guess that's my cue to follow his
> p.s.after all my words going on and on i found a quote that says it all;
> find the shortest, simplest way between the earth, the hands, and the
> mouth.---lanza del vasto
Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your homepage.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
- << Previous post in topic Next post in topic >>