Re: NEWS FLASH! PORCUPINE FREEDOM FESTIVAL GOING VIRAL THIS YEAR!
- Rumor unsubstantiated by ticket sales or campsite rentals.
I expect 700.
--- In email@example.com, Tim Condon <tim@...> wrote:
> *WHOA! This is getting out of hand: It's going to be great!*
> Just so everyone knows, and can spread the word, I've just talked to Rogers
> Campground in Lancaster, NH. They expect "over a thousand people" at the
> PorcFest this year! "We're seeing double the numbers we saw last year," the
> Rogers Campground person told me. *YIKES!* The Porcupine Freedom Festival is
> going *viral!* That means Liberty in Our Lifetimes is definitely *Within
> Reach!* We all better make it, or we're going to miss one *historic Freedom
> Bash* this year! See you all later this month!
> Timothy Condon, Esq.
> 12 Liberty Lane, Grafton, NH 03240
> Telephone 207-956-9041 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting 207-956-9041 end_of_the_skype_highlighting
> 307 South Fielding Avenue, Ste. #2
> Tampa, Florida 33606
> 813-251-2626 Fax 813-200-3395
> Email: tim@...
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
- On 6/29/2010 2:48 PM, Tim Condon wrote:
> Good idea, Bill. Define "offender." If an "offender" is someone a moderator"Offender" in the context of the list in question. Someone whose posts
> disagrees with politically or ideologically, we have a problem. If an
> "offender" is someone who posts something a moderator doesn't think applies
> to the Free State Project and/or its mission, but the writer does, we have a
> problem. If an "offender" is someone a moderator doesn't like, and acts on
> that dislike by virtue of his or her power as a moderator, we have a
> problem. If an "offender" is someone who wants to pitch ideas or talk about
> things that a moderator doesn't, and the moderator seizes upon the
> opportunity to censor those ideas or things...then we've got a problem.
> Like I said, how about letting the free market of ideas, and the community,
> take care of any problems in the absence of outright violations of Free
> State Project ideals? (I.e. no racism, no bigotry, no advocating violence to
> attain political ends, etc.) ---Tim Condon
are rejected for off-topic, spam, etc (in addition to racism, etc.). Are
you saying the mods /currently/ block posts with which they merely
disagree? Why would the definition change? Are you saying somebody who
wants to post 50 male enhancement ads a day on this private property
somehow has a right, and should just be left to his own devices, and
other members simply must deal with it on their own or leave?
I have absolutely no idea what percentage of posts are rejected around
here currently. My own owned or moderated lists have none, but my
largest is still under 200 members and is well hidden so it doesn't
attract spammers. If there are essentially no rejections here, either
(and as long as it mercifully stayed that way), then I'd absolutely
second your suggestion. But if that's not the case, I offered what I
consider a workable compromise. Or at least an experiment...
--= My life, my property, my decisions. =--
--= BikerBill=- ©¿©¬ =--
--= allemanse.com=- =--
-US Constitution (c)1791 All Rights Reserved-