Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.
 

Re: [FSP] Fwd: politics of the psc 341 professor (fwd)

Expand Messages
  • wolzybk
    Which is instructive, since that characterization is the false stereotype of libertarianism that those who oppose it put forth to discredit us. Many, if not
    Message 1 of 17 , Oct 3, 2006
      Which is instructive, since that characterization is the false
      stereotype of libertarianism that those who oppose it put forth to
      discredit us. Many, if not most, liberals believe this about us.

      And much of our own rhetoric can easily be interpreted this way,
      especially by those who have forgotten (or never learned) that there
      are other ways to accomplish things than government. For instance,
      most Americans are completely acclimated to the idea of universal
      public education, and can't imagine that it could be handled any
      other way. So when we say anything about separating school and
      state, they jump to the idea that we oppose education. So it is
      important (and will increasingly become more so as we grow in power
      in NH) that whenever we speak to oppose a government policy, that we
      also include a positive alternative solution to the issue or problem
      that the policy is intended to deal with.

      Also, it will become increasingly important to clarify our consistent
      positions in favor of liberty as a "brand" or package, distinct in
      itself. The Constitution Party and its ilk share much of our
      rhetoric, and many of our economic policies, and it is very easy for
      the uninformed to confuse us with them. However, they genuinely
      *are* an "extreme right-wing philosophy", based on an intolerant
      interpretation of Christianity, and advocating a U.S. government
      based on how they interpret the Bible. So any productive efforts to
      attract those who might come to us from the left will necessarily
      have to include educational information to separate us from them.

      A group of them borrowed our idea, and started a group
      called "Christian Exodus" to try to establish a Christian state in
      South Carolina. I like to refer to it as the TSP [Theocratic State
      Project]. I've directed a few people in their direction who have
      been attracted to the FSP by the economic policies of libertarianism
      but who turned out to be opposed to personal/social liberty. I don't
      know how they are doing, but I hope they succeed. I'd *love* to see
      federalism really working; to see one state dominated by the
      Constitution Party, and one by the Green Party, and one by the
      Socialist Party, and so on. We could then all see what really works
      best in a variety of ways, and those who prefer different solutions
      could all have them, and we could quit squabbling about a lot of this
      stuff.

      philb

      --- "GTriest" <garyonthenet@...> wrote:
      >
      > Omigod.
      >
      > This writer's characterization of both the FSP & Libertarianism is
      soo off-mark and aspersively slanted so as question his knowledge of
      either.
      >
      > "never contribute anything to American society"? As a libertarian
      tenet? What idiocy!
      > What Libertarianism promotes is a neutrality of obligation to
      contribute to society, there is no bar to doing so!
      > It just doesn't force people to 'contribute' to society. Forcing a
      contribution is obviously theft.
      >
      > "libertarianism is extreme right-wing philosophy" - Abbreviated BS!
      >
      > Do extreme right-wingers demand the personal liberties that
      libertarians do?
      > I don't think so, not by todays definition. And if they did, then I
      guess we ARE all xtreem rightwingers - NOT!!
      >
      > Gary T
    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.