Re: [FSP] Tierney's Article
- There is always next time!
On Mar 15, 2006, at 2:56 PM, Mike Lorrey wrote:
> What is interesting about the Weare vote is that "special protection"
> for Souter is unconstitutional. The Equal Protection clause prohibits
> special legal protections of this sort, so it might be contested on
> that basis: either give the protection to all residents of Weare, or
> nobody gets it.