Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Fw: Re: [Maxwells_Demon] Re: heat engines

Expand Messages
  • Autymn D. C.
    Message 1 of 1 , Sep 30, 2009
    • 0 Attachment
      --- On Wed, 9/30/09, Autymn D. C. <lysdexia@...> wrote:
      > From: Autymn D. C. <lysdexia@...>
      > Subject: Re: [Maxwells_Demon] Re: heat engines
      > To: Maxwells_Demon@yahoogroups.com
      > Date: Wednesday, September 30, 2009, 6:38 PM
      > --- On Tue, 9/29/09, sharpstik <bk2@...>
      > wrote:
      > >i'd like to see that definition. heat is a relative
      > term. any time a
      > >substance is above absolute zero, there is heat, but it
      > is only in
      > >ralation to something that is relatively less energetic
      > that it can be
      > >described as "hot".
      > phenomena -> phenomenon -> fainomenon
      > heat -> warmth, T
      > heat = shift in warmth, Q
      >
      > >how would an insulated area change its temperature?
      > your statements seem
      > >to contradict each other.
      >
      > There are many state functions other than temperature
      > wherewith one can build a heat mill.  If a stile of one
      > medium can host a pressure slope, then why no slopes of
      > other properties?  It only takes another medium of
      > unlike celerity to exploit their inequilibrium, such as
      > between Graeff's gas and wire.  Their freedoms are
      > about 4–8 and 4–6.  Either they must share the same
      > cinetic energhy or the same temperature, but not both. 
      > But one would expect the interface to reach equilibrium.. (I
      > wonder if his wire is magneticly insulated.  There must
      > be a screen of mail outside his tank.) but the two sides
      > aren't in the same inertial frame.
      >
      > -Aut
    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.