[forcefieldpropulsionphysics] Re: Loop quantum teleportation
- May I suggest that you take a look at my web site before spending too much
mental energy thinking about "quantum computation"? Hopefully, there will
be a few spin-offs here and there from the process of trying to make this
work, but the fact is that the theory behind it is false!
Quantum computation works only if quantum entanglement really happens. I
have been studying the experimental evidence for this for some years now,
and I am absolutely certain that it is being routinely misinterpreted. Many
published papers now state that results have been seen that cannot be
explained by any local realist model, implying that this proves quantum
entanglement and "nonlocal" influences are facts that we have to live with.
The tests they use are badly biased, UNLESS quantum theory is right! If you
happen to suspect that QT could be wrong, then you can dismiss the tests:
they are not valid.
One critical part of QT that is involved here is the assumption that light
consists of photons. Photons, they think, must exit by one channel OR the
other at a two-channel polariser. But real light is a wave, and can be
split into waves that exit by BOTH channels. The output waves have lower
amplitude than the input ones (lower classical e/m amplitude, that is) but
there is no physical reason why both should not exist.
Do look at my web site <http://www.aber.ac.uk/~cat> for more. As I
understand it, anyone who accepts a purely wave model of light can forget
about quantum entanglement. They can therefore be sure that quantum
computing as such is impossible. I know they claim to have demonstrated it
on a limited scale, but the demonstrations are VERY obscure, as well as very
useless! Sometimes I wonder if they are just pulling our legs!
I printed out one of the papers you refer to earlier today: Jones J.A. NMR
Quantum Computation: a Critical Evaluation. Mon, 28 Feb 2000 11:26:47 GMT,
http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/quant-ph/0002085 . I haven't had time to look at it
yet, but I hoped from the abstract to find some healthy scepticism.
- Gentleman, Gentleman, PLEASE!!!!!.........amusing, but ONLY propulsion,
engineering, and physics!!!!,....NO off-topic discussions please!!!
----- Original Message -----
Sent: 06 March 2000 15:29
Subject: [forcefieldpropulsionphysics] Re: Re:Re:Re:-->Pink mathematical
> Dear Adrien,
> >> Dear Neil
> >> Thanks! I had a look at
> >> http://www.pmicro.kz/MISC/UFL/Almanach/N1_99/Insight.htm .
> >> I believe I already regularly practice your "merging vision", but I'm
> >> I probably do not have enough faith to achieve "soft vision". Never
> >> I shall just have to make do with my present episodes in which I feel
> >one with the whole universe.
> >== That's ranked as "Nature Mysticism" ok it its own way but it fails to
> >one further in or higher up or better cleared.
> >Slightly more relaxing than
> Ha,ha,hilarious! Adrien you are hilarious! Lucky you were not born during
> Victorian ages or during catholic Inquisition!!!
> They did not like hilarious people at these epochs,same as in the White
> As far as I am concerned,masturbation does not relax me! I need the
> or endoreal 3 D + t shapes!!! I will not tell you my dreams of this
> night...I was with a great Philippina!Ouh là là. And what great buttocks.
> Do you know,by the way,that in Egypt the government has forbidden the use
> of Viagra?
> The reason was because the egyptian government felt Viagra would destroy
> families even though in the muslim religion you have the right to have 4
> wives!!!! Hilarious.
> In French we call a hot man a "hot rabbit".Same in English?
> It seems we have been drifting away from forcefield propulsion since some
> days,even though the above topic remains in the "propulsion" sector but
> vectored by muscles rather than fields!
> And not that kind of propulsion which will bring us to the moon,at least
> the moon we see in the skies...
> Goes for bodily, sensory phenomena and it does not clear the
> >mind up. It does not need 'faith', merely trust in the incredible
> >of the human mind. However if one can FEEL at one with the whole
> >why not consider this goes for thinking and awareness too, as well as all
> >the action?
> Can you elaborrrate?
> To Post a message, send it to: forcefieldpropulsionphysics@...
> To Unsubscribe, send a blank message to:
> Planning a party? iParty.com is your complete source for party planning
> supplies, with everything you need to throw the perfect party!
> eGroups.com home: http://www.egroups.com/group/forcefieldpropulsionphysics
> http://www.egroups.com - Simplifying group communications