Re: [forcefieldpropulsionphysics] Re: More on ....shattering beliefs - Definitions
- [ thanks to someone for fixing the html junk]
Reponse to Jack Martinelli .............AGAIN 'Missed
the definitions 'again', of Space and Time" AGAIN, STILL, YET.
Reading used to be a property of learning.
From what you say, I'd guess you don't know what you're talking about.
Maybe you do. I don't know what's in your head.
The article you refer to was pretty brain dead -- reminds of a Donald Duck
cartoon about relativity. And because you refer to this article as if it
a miracle... well, it makes me wonder if you know what you're talking
Ambiguous definitions aren't anything to get excited about.
Here's a discussion staring point that I think may justify some solid
for space & time: Explain why a vector space has only a single
basis function and a tensor space has a dual basis and what this has to
do with general relativity. (I still haven't heard a good explanation of