RE: neutrinos : one can see that at 30 degrees phase the electrical charge is +2/3, and at 60 degrees is +1/3. These resemble the bquarks... You also get the right number of quarks (considering the spin too).
- Ross wrote:
> The mass issue for neutrinos is calculated via the loss ofSomething like that indeed. The mass of the neutrinos is known just as a
> energy from beta
> type reactions, not from any actual interaction with the
> particle that
> could really measure it's mass.
domain in which it can take values. There are several sources to evaluate
upper limits of the neutrino mass. For instance, from cosmological
neutrinos cannot have a mass higher than 65 eV. Note that mass here is not
measured based on inertia or gravity, but rather from the energy
conservation and momentum conservation laws and their relativistic
relationship. Therefore, what actually is measured is the square of the
mass. That means when people say that muon neutrino is heavier than the
electronic neutrino, one should consider this with caution, because all mass
differences are also squared and the relationship may be actually the other
> neutrinos with 90 / 270 phase angle charge, we cannot use 0Let's clarify this too: 270 phase neutrino is what is called antineutrino.
Or not? Logically, if you take electron and positron as being 180 degrees
apart, it follows that neutrino 90 and neutrino 270 are the particle and
> 0 I assign to be positive, and 180 is negative, so 90 and 270What you say is equivalent with: draw a circle of radius 1 in the xOy plane.
> are both neutral phases).
Start counting the phase from the point (1,0) (located on axis Ox),
Then at point (1,0) is the electron, at point (0,1) is the neutrino, at
point (-1,0) is the positron and at point (0,-1) is the antineutrino. The
axis Ox defines the electrical charge, while the axis Oy defines the
neutrino-charge (or whatever name). The neutrinos have both zero electrical
charge and the electrons have both zero neutrino-charge. That's at least how
I pictured this.
Then you can start wondering: what's at 30 degrees phase? At 60 degrees? and
With the assumptions from above, one can see that at 30 degrees phase the
electrical charge is +2/3, and at 60 degrees is +1/3. These reasamble the
quarks... You also get the right number of quarks (considering the spin
I went through this sort of deduction, but sincerely I am not quite
satisfied. It does not give new answers and some other things are turning
out wrongly. I don't exclude a mistake on my side either.
> be the cause of nuclear beta decay. Further, it couldYes. That's what I believe too, but from different reasons.
> reasonably be that
> we are bathed in a sea of neutrinos that really are just like
> electrons and
> The neutrino issue is far more complicated than others know,Quite true. And it is a pity that efforts are not focussed on neutrinos.
> and far from solved.
Thousands of people study the heavy quarks, when these have little if no
impact at all in the going of the Universe. While with the neutrinos is a
totally different story: they play a major role in cosmology.