Re: Cosmological drag?
- Dear Aleksandr
> The nonlinearity of deep space in relation toYes, I agree.
> propagation of electromagnetic waves is the reason " of red
> displacement " and other changes of frequency.
> Space and boundary areas (nonlinearity) between units of spaceYes, I too have found a limited need to think about these boundary areas. I
> The universe, observed by us,
> is derivated by infinite hierarchies of planetary
> systems of a various physical nature. Each of stationary (planetary)
> system generates the its own unit of space. The hierarchies of these
> units of space generate space of the Universe. Between units of space
> there are boundary areas ...
was trying to account for the fact that Dayton Miller detected an aether
drift of only about 10 km/s instead of the 300 km/s that might have been
expected due to the motion of the Solar system. I think there can be fairly
sudden changes in aether velocity at boundaries such as the heliopause.
> The red shiftCould you possibly remind me what the Raman effect is? I have no text books
> 1. One from properties of boundary area between gravitational
> stationary (planetary) systems is the transformation of frequency
> of an incident electromagnetic wave (analog of Raman's effect for
> gravitational systems).
> ... for far systems we do not know theirs true positionsAgreed! We know really very little. Even the red shift itself could be
> in space.
partly an experimental artifact (for example if the velocity of very very
weak, very incoherent, light in glass if not the same as that in laboratory
conditions), or the result of biased "corrections" to the data.
> There are others otherwise-minded conceptual approaches:I found this just what I wanted! I have recently read a biography of Hubble
and it told me nothing compared to this essay. It did point out that Hubble
tried always to say "apparent velocity" when talking of the red shift, but
it did not tell me that it was Einstein and his followers who actively
distorted history, attributing the whole expanding universe idea to him!
because ever since Einstein and Shankland rubbished Miller's results we have
not been looking!