Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Re: Computer-assisted Lexicon generation

Expand Messages
  • wordwulf
    ... dyr). ... dör. ... then is 12, ... English as ... pronunciation), ... are ... count it this way ... look at ... Now we see ... wheel now we ... However,
    Message 1 of 10 , Nov 25, 2002
    • 0 Attachment
      --- In folkspraak@y..., Daan Goedkoop <dgoedkoop@g...> wrote:
      > With the two examples given it looks that it works well.
      > Btw. deur means "door" in Dutch. You might mean duur (pronunciation
      > Door then has Eng. door, Dutch deur, German Tür and Scandinavian
      > Eng. 6, Dutch 2,5 (?), German 1 and Swedish 2.5 (?). The average
      then is 12,
      > which makes 3 (*dir). I guess in this case it is better to count
      English as
      > 0, which makes 1,5 (*dyr).
      > If we wrote Dutch with umlaut-vowels, we would get dör (same
      > as in Swedish, and then we can see door/dör/tür/dör. 3 of 4 vowels
      > umlauted and thus front vowels, and 3 of 4 are an o or ö. If you
      count it this way
      > you would get dör, and I guess that is much better than dyr or dir.
      > Eng. dear (?), Dutch duur, German Teuer, Scandinavian dyr. If we
      look at
      > pronunciation we get dIIr/dyr/toier/dyr. 3 of 4 are front vowels.
      Now we see
      > that German is really different from the others, if we se the vowel
      wheel now we
      > would get 3,5/2/(6+3/2)=4,5/2, total 12, which makes 3 (*dir).
      However, if
      > you count o as 0, which is also possible (it is a wheel), you get
      > total 9, which makes 2 (*dyr). I think that would not be a bad
      choice, as
      > this form is found exactly the same in 2 of the 4 source languages.
      > Eng. deer (shifted meaning), Dutch dier, German Tier, Scandinavian
      > Pronunciation dIIr, dier, tier, dyr. All front. Now vowel wheel:
      3,5/3/3/2, total
      > 11,5, makes 2,8 (*dir, or dier, depends on how to write long i).
      Looks to
      > work right.
      > Eng. beast, Dutch beest, German n/a, Scandinavian n/a isn't the
      right coice,
      > only found in two of 4 languages.
      > List:
      > door/deur/tür/dör = dir/dyr/DÖR
      > deer/dier/tier/dyr = DIR/DIER
      > dear/duur/teuer/dyr = DYR
      > Erik: Ik denke it ar gud, but not with DOOR.
      > Daan.

      Hmm, door, well, if we look at Old High German, we see the uo
      raising, so the original vowel was probably a back vowel. So-a=1,
      o=2, u=3, y=4. English oo=2, Dutch eu=1.5, Swedish umlauted o= plain
      o or 2, and German umlauted u = 4, total 9.5, divided by 4 = 2.37 or
      o, so we get Folkspraak *dor. So which number you assign to each
      vowel at the beginning makes a big difference. I guess this system
      needs tweaking.
      Dank so myk,
    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.