- --- In folkspraak@y..., "peter_reep" <peter_reep@y...> wrote:
> Yes, this would work in these cases, but I suspect it will have tobe
> a more complicated rule. Consider:more
> Vat strek de Auto?
> Ik vet nit vat strek de Auto.
> Det var de Bus dat strek de Auto.
> De Auto strek vat?
> Ik vet nit vat de Auto strek.
> Det var de Bom dat de Auto strek.
> So should the rule be:
> The object always comes after the subject in the main clause, but in
> a subordinate clause...
> Or should the above subordinate clauses have their order changed?
> I will try to think up other examples to test the rule when I've
Perhaps we should say that:
a) the subject always comes before the object in main clauses
b) in relative pronoun subordinate clauses where the relative pronoun
is in the object case, it is separated from the verb by the subject.
De auto slagde de bom.
De auto slagde vat?
Ik vet net vat de auto slagde.
Hi fragde vat de auto slagde.
Hi fragde vat slagde de auto.
De tug slagde de auto.
Vann slagde de tug de auto?
Hi fragde vann de tug slagde de auto.
vat have de auto slagt?
Vat have slagt de auto?
En tug have slagt de auto.
De auto have slagt en bom.
Have de auto slagt en bom?
Thus, only the subject or an adverb can occur immediately in front of
a verb. If an object pronoun occurs before the main verb, the subject
comes next, right before the verb. Helping verbs come before the
subject in questions, but the participle/main verb never does. Whew!
This is beginning to get complicated.
> --- In folkspraak@y..., "wordwulf" <eparsels@n...> wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I think we can do the question thing without using an accusative
> > without being forced into the passive. If we make it a rule that
> > object always comes after the subject, we have no problem.
> > What hit the car? Vat slagde de auto?
> > The car hit what? De auto slagde vat?
> > The second option is used in English, although the form 'What did
> > car hit?' is more common. But this strategy above gives us a
> > rule to follow, that subject always precedes object, as long as we
> > willing to put the question word elsewhere than the beginning of
> > sentence. For yes/no questions, inverting the subject and verb is
> > sufficient.
> > Erik