9754Re: My FS
- Nov 1 5:45 AMJo. Ig (!) giss du hav recht, aver de hirkomft av de /k/ laud fron
ald germaisch et cetera iss nit so reglig ov man hav /g/. Aver ja, et
iss en better men-typ. Ig witt nit warfor de link funktion nit -
schraib www.members.lycos.co.uk/rsookias end dan klikk "Folksprak
info" up-an de link said.
--- In firstname.lastname@example.org, "chamavian" <roerd096@...> wrote:
> Sorry, I couldn't open the link, only get commercial stuff. Maybe
> can just put it in our Files section?
> By the way, "ig" is much more representative for the major living
> Germanic languages than "ik" (or "ick", "ikk"). The first pronoun
> singular ending in final -k only exists in Dutch "ik".
> English I has no ending (or maybe a "j"?), German the soft ch [C]
> Scandinavian a, mostly silent, -g Da "jeg", Sw "jag",
> NorwBM "jei"(NewNorw "eg").
> So if we'd take an average final sound, it would be defenitely not -
> but rather -g:
> English -
> German ch
> Dutch k
> Scandi g
> If we'd take more languages and count them all, the picture won't
> English - (j?)
> German ch
> Dutch(+Afr) k
> Danish g
> LowSaxon k
> Icelandic g
> Norwegian - (j?)
> Swedish g
> Frisian k
> Swytzer -
> Yiddish sh
> here we find 3 final k's and 3 final g's, 3 silent and 2 other,
> although most final g's are pronounced as if silent.
> The average sound of this can never be the hard k.
> But as most people here don't want to take too many source
> into account: even if one would only take English I and Dutch ik,
> intermediate should be with final g. That's phonoLogics.
> For that alone, to me the FS pronoun first pers sing can only be
> Something else is that in Danish and Norwegian "ikke" means "not",
> which would make it confusing for Scandies if FS "ik" meant "I".
> "Ig" is immediately recognizable for everyone.
> --- In email@example.com, "Roly Sookias/Roley Sukius"
> <xipirho@> wrote:
> > Ik witt nit ov ik hav dis forhir segd, aver ik hav en bittken
> > an hu ik tenk FS schuld wese hir http://www.members.lycos.co.uk/
> > rsookias/myfolksprak.html . Et giv en oder two tings nu dé ik
> > fremd - ik tenk "ik" iss magwes better als "ig", end "bai-said"
> > tenk schuld "besaid" oder "bai" wese for "bai-said" iss swer tu
> > Ok ik brauk de schraibungs "sch" end "ch" nu ...aver "sh" and "h"
> > OK sikker.
- << Previous post in topic Next post in topic >>