Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

9611Re: Words

Expand Messages
  • David Parke
    Oct 4, 2006
      Why don't you post summaries of you new words on the Yahoo group? This
      is where FSers are most likely to read them and are able to review and
      critique them.

      --- In folkspraak@yahoogroups.com, "stefichjo" <sts@...> wrote:
      >
      > Oops, I forgot to mention the URL (you might bookmark it):
      >
      > http://de.wikibooks.org/wiki/Folksprak/_Wortschatz
      >
      > Bye,
      > Stephan
      >
      > --- In folkspraak@yahoogroups.com, "stefichjo" <sts@> wrote:
      > >
      > > I have improved the format of my Wordskatt (partially, i. e. for
      > the
      > > letter L). For example:
      > >
      > > lub-o >> lub > luv (DE Liebe)(EN love, luv)
      > >
      > > means:
      > > Proto Germanic form: lub-o
      > > Fulkspraek form: lub
      > > Folksprak form: lov
      > > German form: Liebe
      > > Englisch form: love, luv
      > >
      > > Your feedback is welcome.
      > >
      > > --- In folkspraak@yahoogroups.com, "stefichjo" <sts@> wrote:
      > > >
      > > > It's good to have some feedback, Dave. Thank you.
      > > > I guess the main reason for the Wordskatt to be difficult to read
      > is
      > > > that the FS vocabulary is always written in Fulkspraek. This is
      > > > because my transformation rules (Fulkspraek to Folksprak) were
      > still
      > > > changing. Now, so I guess, they have come to a stable static
      > > version,
      > > > and I might even dare to write the Folksprak-version for each
      > > > Fulkspraek-vocabulary. Would this make the Wordkskatt easier to
      > > read,
      > > > or do have other ideas?
      > > > At the moment I'm concentrating on FS morphology, which causes
      > many,
      > > > many examples in the Wordskatt. I am defining -lik, -ig, fer-, ge-
      > ,
      > > > be- and others are about to follow.
      > > > I have just re-worked on the vocabularies based on PG *laub.
      > Pretty
      > > a
      > > > puzzle.
      > > > Unfortunately you would need to browse the Wikibook-page's
      > history
      > > in
      > > > order to see changes and subsequently new entries in it. This is
      > not
      > > > that comfortable like your approach, but it could work. At the
      > > moment
      > > > each new vocabulary gets formatted in a way that I find better to
      > > > read: a cognate vocabulary (for example DE Haus, EN house,
      > cognates
      > > of
      > > > FS hus) is written bold. So wherever you encounter a bold word,
      > it
      > > is
      > > > probably new.
      > > >
      > > > --- In folkspraak@yahoogroups.com, "David Parke" <parked@> wrote:
      > > > >
      > > > > Yes sometimes I am inspired to create words based upon what you
      > or
      > > > > other FSers write. It is good to have the perspective of
      > someone
      > > who
      > > > > approachs FS from a different point of view and has a different
      > > native
      > > > > language.
      > > > > I have trouble reading your Wordskatt on your Wiki, to tell you
      > > the
      > > > > truth. Is there anyway of seperating out the new(er) words and
      > > > > updates, so I don't need to digest it all at once?
      > > > >
      > > > >
      > > > > --- In folkspraak@yahoogroups.com, "stefichjo" <sts@> wrote:
      > > > > >
      > > > > > Hi David,
      > > > > >
      > > > > > I noticed that sometimes when I modify my Wordskatt you add
      > > similar
      > > > > > words to your Ueberlist (and vice versa, I often think about
      > > your new
      > > > > > words, which inspires me to add new words to my list).
      > > > > > If yes, I would appreciate some feed-back from time to time.
      > > > > > I would also like to know if you found the comments I gave to
      > > you
      > > > > > usefull or not.
      > > > > >
      > > > >
      > > >
      > >
      >
    • Show all 9 messages in this topic