Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

9610Re: Words

Expand Messages
  • stefichjo
    Oct 4, 2006
    • 0 Attachment
      Oops, I forgot to mention the URL (you might bookmark it):

      http://de.wikibooks.org/wiki/Folksprak/_Wortschatz

      Bye,
      Stephan

      --- In folkspraak@yahoogroups.com, "stefichjo" <sts@...> wrote:
      >
      > I have improved the format of my Wordskatt (partially, i. e. for
      the
      > letter L). For example:
      >
      > lub-o >> lub > luv (DE Liebe)(EN love, luv)
      >
      > means:
      > Proto Germanic form: lub-o
      > Fulkspraek form: lub
      > Folksprak form: lov
      > German form: Liebe
      > Englisch form: love, luv
      >
      > Your feedback is welcome.
      >
      > --- In folkspraak@yahoogroups.com, "stefichjo" <sts@> wrote:
      > >
      > > It's good to have some feedback, Dave. Thank you.
      > > I guess the main reason for the Wordskatt to be difficult to read
      is
      > > that the FS vocabulary is always written in Fulkspraek. This is
      > > because my transformation rules (Fulkspraek to Folksprak) were
      still
      > > changing. Now, so I guess, they have come to a stable static
      > version,
      > > and I might even dare to write the Folksprak-version for each
      > > Fulkspraek-vocabulary. Would this make the Wordkskatt easier to
      > read,
      > > or do have other ideas?
      > > At the moment I'm concentrating on FS morphology, which causes
      many,
      > > many examples in the Wordskatt. I am defining -lik, -ig, fer-, ge-
      ,
      > > be- and others are about to follow.
      > > I have just re-worked on the vocabularies based on PG *laub.
      Pretty
      > a
      > > puzzle.
      > > Unfortunately you would need to browse the Wikibook-page's
      history
      > in
      > > order to see changes and subsequently new entries in it. This is
      not
      > > that comfortable like your approach, but it could work. At the
      > moment
      > > each new vocabulary gets formatted in a way that I find better to
      > > read: a cognate vocabulary (for example DE Haus, EN house,
      cognates
      > of
      > > FS hus) is written bold. So wherever you encounter a bold word,
      it
      > is
      > > probably new.
      > >
      > > --- In folkspraak@yahoogroups.com, "David Parke" <parked@> wrote:
      > > >
      > > > Yes sometimes I am inspired to create words based upon what you
      or
      > > > other FSers write. It is good to have the perspective of
      someone
      > who
      > > > approachs FS from a different point of view and has a different
      > native
      > > > language.
      > > > I have trouble reading your Wordskatt on your Wiki, to tell you
      > the
      > > > truth. Is there anyway of seperating out the new(er) words and
      > > > updates, so I don't need to digest it all at once?
      > > >
      > > >
      > > > --- In folkspraak@yahoogroups.com, "stefichjo" <sts@> wrote:
      > > > >
      > > > > Hi David,
      > > > >
      > > > > I noticed that sometimes when I modify my Wordskatt you add
      > similar
      > > > > words to your Ueberlist (and vice versa, I often think about
      > your new
      > > > > words, which inspires me to add new words to my list).
      > > > > If yes, I would appreciate some feed-back from time to time.
      > > > > I would also like to know if you found the comments I gave to
      > you
      > > > > usefull or not.
      > > > >
      > > >
      > >
      >
    • Show all 9 messages in this topic