Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Clip: NYT Review of Simon Reynolds's _Rip It Up and Start Again_

Expand Messages
  • Carl Z.
    Rip It Up and Start Again: Postpunk 1978-1984, by Simon Reynolds Postpunk d Review by JIM
    Message 1 of 1 , Mar 5, 2006

      'Rip It Up and Start Again: Postpunk 1978-1984,' by Simon Reynolds

      Review by JIM WINDOLF
      Published: March 5, 2006

      Punk rock was great and it made for a great story. The Ramones and
      other upstart bands came out of nowhere, playing songs that were loud,
      fast and obnoxious. With more passion than skill, they made the
      established rock stars look like pompous windbags. The movement came
      to a fitting end with the self-destruction of the Sex Pistols in 1978.
      Johnny Rotten turned back into John Lydon, Sid Vicious overdosed and
      everybody else pulled their safety pins out of their cheeks. Since
      then, scores of writers and filmmakers have been attracted to punk's
      outrageous characters and shapely plot.

      The story of punk's aftermath is more fragmented, with no clear
      beginning, a mixed-up middle and a whimper of an ending. Pop-culture
      historians have found it easy to avoid. With "Rip It Up and Start
      Again," the brainy music critic Simon Reynolds steps forward to accept
      the challenge. He is a brave man.

      He begins with the demise of the Sex Pistols and the start of John
      Lydon's next band, the innovative Public Image Ltd. After following
      the careers of various British and American groups, like Joy Division,
      the Fall, Gang of Four, Talking Heads, Devo, Pere Ubu, the Specials
      and the Human League, he reaches an anticlimactic ending with Frankie
      Goes to Hollywood, the Liverpool act responsible for the repetitive
      1984 hit "Relax." (Charges are still pending.) David Bowie pops into
      the narrative from time to time in the role of postpunk's worldly

      This music was the soundtrack of the author's teenage years in
      suburban England, and he still has great affection for it. "Being as
      impartial and detached here as possible," he writes, "it seems to me
      that the long 'aftermath' of punk running from 1978-84 was way more
      musically interesting than what happened in 1976 and 1977, when punk
      staged its back-to-basics rock 'n' roll revival." Just in case fans of
      rock's supposed golden age feel left out of this barroom argument, he
      also writes: "The postpunk era makes a fair match for the 60's in
      terms of the sheer amount of great music created, the spirit of
      adventure and idealism that infused it, and the way that the music
      seemed inextricably connected to the political and social turbulence
      of its era."

      But "postpunk" proves to be a slippery label. If Reynolds wasn't aware
      of this when he started his research, he learned it the hard way while
      talking with various postpunk musicians for this book. "A lot of them,
      when I mentioned postpunk, didn't quite understand what I meant," he
      said in an interview posted on his Web site. "Which is odd, because I
      did all this research in the music papers, and that was what people
      called it, even then. . . . It's not something I've invented!"

      Reynolds loves obscure genre labels. He has coined at least one
      ("postrock") and in this book he embraces countless others with a
      straight face, among them "funk punk," "punk funk," "folk punk,"
      "anarcho-punk," "Hi-NRG," "psychobilly," "angst rock," "trad rock,"
      "death rock," "death disco," "mutant disco," "Teutonica," "Goth,"
      "proto-Goth," "post-Goth," "Oi!" "New Romanticism," "New Rock," "New
      Americana," "New Pop," "electropop," "synthpop," "synthpop noir,"
      "synthfunk," "avant-funk" and, deep breath, "neopostpunk." Will there
      be a quiz?

      Strangely, given Reynolds's zeal for taxonomy, a theme running through
      his books — which include the authoritative "Generation Ecstasy: Into
      the World of Techno and Rave Culture" — is that the most exciting
      music releases its listeners from the intellect's hold, delivering
      them into a primal state.

      A majority of his new book's subjects started out creating punklike
      music and went on to develop a sophisticated, dance-oriented sound. As
      they matured, they abandoned their amateurish or experimental
      beginnings to make polished records meant to sell in great numbers.
      That's how it went for Talking Heads, the Fall, Devo, Gang of Four,
      Joy Division, Scritti Politti and the B-52's, whose careers are
      analyzed here.

      That's also how it went for the Clash, which made a rude noise in 1977
      and sold big in 1982 with a brand of expensively produced pop that
      borrowed from funk and reggae. But the Clash doesn't make Reynolds's
      postpunk list. Neither do similar acts of the era, like the Jam, the
      Police, X, Elvis Costello and Blondie, all of whom began by making raw
      music only to end up turning out more sophisticated fare tinged with
      soul, funk, reggae, disco, hip-hop or Latin touches.

      It's easier for a critic to attack than to praise, but Reynolds takes
      more pleasure in expressing passion for the music he loves than in
      putting down what doesn't fit his program. The author finds his
      perfect subject in the one-named Green, the Marxist leader of Scritti
      Politti. The band lived in a collective at first. Then Green had a
      breakdown, followed by a vision of himself as a subversive star
      disrupting the pop charts from within. He wrote a manifesto laying out
      his justifications for what might be called selling out and made his
      way into Britain's Top 10 with the 1984 release "Wood Beez (Pray Like
      Aretha Franklin)." The hit album that followed spun off a No. 11
      single in the United States, "Perfect Way."

      Describing Green's lyrics, which sound like the stuff of conventional
      love songs on first listen, Reynolds is overwrought: "On closer
      inspection, though, they turned out to be pretzels of contradiction,
      with an aporia (the poststructuralist term for voids in the fabric of
      meaning) lurking in the center of every twist of language, sweet
      nothings that could wreck your heart." The windy phrasings bring to
      mind the fatal flaw of many pop music critics: because they write
      about things not considered high art, they panic and break out the
      99-cent locutions. Naturally, Reynolds keeps it real by dropping in
      expletives between references to Roland Barthes and Jacques Derrida.
      "Rip It Up and Start Again" is exhaustive and exhausting in equal

      Postpunk 1978-1984.
      By Simon Reynolds.
      416 pp. Penguin Books. Paper, $16.

      Jim Windolf is a contributing editor at Vanity Fair.
    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.