[Fantasy Fiction Dungeon] Re: Discussion
- I think i was talking to you. What were we talking about? lol. Ah,
Robert Jordan. I agree with everything you said, though i thought
everything up to Fires of Heaven or Lord of Chaos was really good. A
Crown of Swords is when everything degenerated into cliche driven
I think the point is the minor subcharacters, the meandering plots,
the world spanning world building, the convoluted politicing and
romantic fluffyness, and the unsympathetic, whiny characters. It
wears on me and don't have the time like i did 15 years ago to wade
through everything. What is the publish date on the Eye of the
World, anyway? 1990?
Tad Williams and Martin write the way i would like to write. I'm
more snappy in my dialog and description than they are, but that
came from training and dogged deliberation. In my youth, i could
write lyrical circles that meandered all over the place. Too bad i
can't mix them both together. Still trying to find that magical
--- In email@example.com, karl barnes
> Are talking to me, Matt? I'll answer as if you were. I've onlyread the first Goodkind book and found a mess. The characters
motivations seemed to be a bit cockeyed and strained. Rahl was such
dull and droll villain that I had a hard time taking him seriously.
As with Jordan, his descriptions were endless, his Aes Sadi(sp?)
came off as being arrogant and seemed to be almost as bad as the
villians, the heroes were so stereo-typical and uninteresting. I
actually got half way through "The Dragon Born"(I think that was the
title) , when I just put the book down and never had the urge to
pick it up again.
>verbage and unnecessarily twisting and turning plots. When they
> For both of these authors, it was a labor to wade through their
seemed to be going somewhere with the story, they cut to some sub-
plot that was never really gotten back too, until the next book or
it was so miniumal that you didn't really need it in the story. I'm
sorry, if I'm being general, but it has been years, since I've read
these books(somewhere around the mid/late 90s).
>through them without having my attention wandering. Plus, their
> And yes, Martin and Willaims novels ar huge, but I breezed
characters came alive to me. They didn't come off as stereo-typical,
eventhough you could see both authors using the archetypal
characters, Williams with silly boy, who becomes the heero and
Martin with his foreshadowing with the Dire wolves and giving one
side of certain characters and later revealing more about said
characters, especially Tyrion and Jamie.
>Goodkind, I can't see the appeal. There just doesn't seem to be any
> Though there are some readers, who swear by both Jordan and
pay off or end in sight with these two authors. I could be wrong,
but that is how I see it.
> Matt <gauvaine@y...> wrote:
> Well, can you elaborate on that? I think you're correct. I would
> throw Tad Williams into that category of writing and character
> fluffy nonsense that goes nowhere.is
> It's not always easy to make your characters 3 dimensional, even
> harder when you have 30 sub characters that you throw in that add
> nothing to the overall story. Jordan drives me crazy with that. I
> can't keep all the names straight.
> --- In firstname.lastname@example.org, karl barnes
> <priestvyrce@y...> wrote:
> > Well, one fundemental difference is that Martin, though slow,
> by far a more interesting and competent writer. His charactersdon't
> come off as false or as puppets dancing to his tune.That's justfrom
> the top of my head.grenade
> > Matt <gauvaine@y...> wrote:Okay, i'm going to throw a hand
> and see what comes to theGeorge
> > surface.
> > What are the fundamental differences between Robert Jordan,
> > Martin, and Terry Goodkind?more
> > They all write long, unending epic novels with tons of world
> > building, a cast of thousands, and meandering plots that are
> > convoluted than a Gordian knot. Why do we keep buying thesemust
> > And is there some formula inherent in their makeup that they
> > follow?which
> > I'm just curious. I stop reading Jordan at Path of Daggers,
> > i'm halfway through. Martin, i got tired of waiting for A Feastof
> > Crows to come forth after waiting 5 years after Storm of Swordsfiction movies Fantasy game Science fiction
> > published. And Terry Goodkind cranks his out every year, like
> > clockwork. Or every 14 to 16 months, depending.
> > Is it time for a new torch to be passed to someone else, say
> > Stackpole, Sean McMullen, Kevin Anderson, to name a few?
> > I only say this because it's cyclic. When i was in highschool,
> > Brooks, David Eddings, Tracy Hickman and Margaret Weis were the
> > novelists of the moment.
> > ---------------------------------
> > YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
> > Visit your group "fantasyfictiondungeon" on the web.
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> > email@example.com
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
> > ---------------------------------
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> SPONSORED LINKS
> Fantasy science fiction Fantasy science fiction magazine Science
> YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
> Visit your group "fantasyfictiondungeon" on the web.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
- Absolutely, but not monologues. I prefer dialog to just about everything, and actions. Descriptive prose is something I avoid like the plague. I prefer what I call experiential prose, in which the scene is not merely described, usually from the author's pov, but instead described as the character currently in focus is experiencing it. Since different people perceive different things in different ways, this makes the description part of the character development. It also makes everything more active and interesting, since I don't describe a State which by itself is valueless, but instead speak of an Act of Perceiving that State, which is the important part.
Additionally, the dialog we were speaking of was intended to describe the author's own viewpoint, usually political or social. There are better ways to do that. Nothing sticks out more than a paragraph or two clumsily inserted.
Saje <soulsaje@...> wrote:
Dialogue works better than exposition.
Author of the Infinity: Earth Saga
Book I "Loki's Sin" available now
Marc Vun Kannon
Unbinding the Stone--Making lemonade from fantasy lemons
Coming in October, 2005--A Warrior Made.
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]