Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

RE: [XP] Re: TDD, XP and debuggers

Expand Messages
  • Ilja Preuss
    ... Yes, but I thought that we were talking about a test that was wrong. Not sure wether that matters, though... Cheers, Ilja
    Message 1 of 260 , Aug 18, 2004
    • 0 Attachment
      Adrian Howard wrote:
      > On 17 Aug 2004, at 12:22, Ilja Preuss wrote:
      > [snip]
      >> It's certainly the case that without pairing/reviews I am more
      >> likely to
      >> *miss* tests - but I don't think that I get more *wrong* tests that
      >> cancel out with wrong implementation...
      >
      > I think it could happen over time.
      >
      > - Lack of pairing might mean I miss duplication so a bit
      > of business logic gets into foo and bar.
      >
      > - My acceptance test for the business logic only uses foo.
      >
      > - Later I change bar incorrectly, but the foo test still passes.
      >
      > False-pass for that bit of business logic.

      Yes, but I thought that we were talking about a test that was wrong. Not
      sure wether that matters, though...

      Cheers, Ilja
    • Ilja Preuss
      ... Yes, but I thought that we were talking about a test that was wrong. Not sure wether that matters, though... Cheers, Ilja
      Message 260 of 260 , Aug 18, 2004
      • 0 Attachment
        Adrian Howard wrote:
        > On 17 Aug 2004, at 12:22, Ilja Preuss wrote:
        > [snip]
        >> It's certainly the case that without pairing/reviews I am more
        >> likely to
        >> *miss* tests - but I don't think that I get more *wrong* tests that
        >> cancel out with wrong implementation...
        >
        > I think it could happen over time.
        >
        > - Lack of pairing might mean I miss duplication so a bit
        > of business logic gets into foo and bar.
        >
        > - My acceptance test for the business logic only uses foo.
        >
        > - Later I change bar incorrectly, but the foo test still passes.
        >
        > False-pass for that bit of business logic.

        Yes, but I thought that we were talking about a test that was wrong. Not
        sure wether that matters, though...

        Cheers, Ilja
      Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.