Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.
 

Re: [XP] Do people prefer to fail than to admit a paradigm change?( or is XP a poisoned term? )

Expand Messages
  • Roy Miller
    ... Programming ... 12 ... ROI ... the ... to ... Consider this confirmation, at least from me. Please do use all the practices when you can, but John s right.
    Message 1 of 75 , Nov 28, 2003
      > >>Ken Auer and Roy Miller propose in their book ("Extreme
      Programming
      > >>Applied", page 71), that although it is better to start with all
      12
      > >>above mentioned practices, it is also feasable to start with only
      > >>the following 6 practices. Ken and Roy call them essential
      > >>practices.
      > >
      > >>Planning Game
      > >>Small Releases
      > >>Testing
      > >>Pair Programming
      > >>Refactoring
      > >>Continuous Integration
      >
      > I interpreted this differently. I pictured them saying that, in an
      > environment that seems hostile to XP, these are the practices worth
      > fighting for just to get your foot in the door. The rest have less
      ROI
      > when you include the effort you spend trying to convince people in
      the
      > "expense" column.
      >
      > I don't think they mean that the remaining practices are candidates
      to
      > discard on an XP project with the appropriate buy-in.
      >
      > Of course, Ken or Roy could just confirm or deny that themselves.

      Consider this confirmation, at least from me. Please do use all the
      practices when you can, but John's right. You sometimes need to pick
      your battles. Win the first set of battles, then move on to the next
      set. I think you'll like the results.

      Roy
    • Roy Miller
      ... Programming ... 12 ... ROI ... the ... to ... Consider this confirmation, at least from me. Please do use all the practices when you can, but John s right.
      Message 75 of 75 , Nov 28, 2003
        > >>Ken Auer and Roy Miller propose in their book ("Extreme
        Programming
        > >>Applied", page 71), that although it is better to start with all
        12
        > >>above mentioned practices, it is also feasable to start with only
        > >>the following 6 practices. Ken and Roy call them essential
        > >>practices.
        > >
        > >>Planning Game
        > >>Small Releases
        > >>Testing
        > >>Pair Programming
        > >>Refactoring
        > >>Continuous Integration
        >
        > I interpreted this differently. I pictured them saying that, in an
        > environment that seems hostile to XP, these are the practices worth
        > fighting for just to get your foot in the door. The rest have less
        ROI
        > when you include the effort you spend trying to convince people in
        the
        > "expense" column.
        >
        > I don't think they mean that the remaining practices are candidates
        to
        > discard on an XP project with the appropriate buy-in.
        >
        > Of course, Ken or Roy could just confirm or deny that themselves.

        Consider this confirmation, at least from me. Please do use all the
        practices when you can, but John's right. You sometimes need to pick
        your battles. Win the first set of battles, then move on to the next
        set. I think you'll like the results.

        Roy
      Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.