Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Re: What is a spike? (was Re: [XP] What objections have you heard to doing a spike?)

Expand Messages
  • Adrian Howard
    On 3 Oct 2007, at 15:07, Ron Jeffries wrote: [snip] ... [snip] I m pretty sure your definition is more globally accepted than mine. I would imagine that I ve
    Message 1 of 36 , Oct 3, 2007
    • 0 Attachment
      On 3 Oct 2007, at 15:07, Ron Jeffries wrote:
      [snip]
      > I was taught by the inventor of the term, whom I may of course have
      > misunderstood entirely, that a spike was an experiment where one
      > quickly blasts through all the levels of some problem, so as better
      > to understand it and its solution.
      >
      > As such, I pull the notion out whenever I see alternatives (or no
      > alternative) and need better understanding.
      >
      > I would try never to do a spike that took a whole day, because I've
      > found that I can usually learn what I need to know in far less time
      > than that. If a spike takes ten minutes, I think that's just fine.
      [snip]

      I'm pretty sure your definition is more globally accepted than mine.
      I would imagine that I've moved from the book definition to mine over
      the years. Silly me.

      Now I think of it - my experimental stories should just be called...
      stories. That's how we treat them after all.

      Adrian (feeling especially dim this week :)
    • Adrian Howard
      On 3 Oct 2007, at 15:07, Ron Jeffries wrote: [snip] ... [snip] I m pretty sure your definition is more globally accepted than mine. I would imagine that I ve
      Message 36 of 36 , Oct 3, 2007
      • 0 Attachment
        On 3 Oct 2007, at 15:07, Ron Jeffries wrote:
        [snip]
        > I was taught by the inventor of the term, whom I may of course have
        > misunderstood entirely, that a spike was an experiment where one
        > quickly blasts through all the levels of some problem, so as better
        > to understand it and its solution.
        >
        > As such, I pull the notion out whenever I see alternatives (or no
        > alternative) and need better understanding.
        >
        > I would try never to do a spike that took a whole day, because I've
        > found that I can usually learn what I need to know in far less time
        > than that. If a spike takes ten minutes, I think that's just fine.
        [snip]

        I'm pretty sure your definition is more globally accepted than mine.
        I would imagine that I've moved from the book definition to mine over
        the years. Silly me.

        Now I think of it - my experimental stories should just be called...
        stories. That's how we treat them after all.

        Adrian (feeling especially dim this week :)
      Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.