Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Re: [extremeperl] CPAN and XP

Expand Messages
  • Rob Nagler
    ... Excellent point. ... I like this. One of the points I try to make in the refactoring chapter is that every refactoring has and equally valid converse.
    Message 1 of 4 , Jan 29, 2002
    • 0 Attachment
      marceusz@a... wrote:
      > Actually I don't find either of these to be particularly true. While
      > it is true that XP works easier with the OO paradigm, One of the XP
      > books states explicitly that it's not required ... and there is
      > nothing in XP per-se that requires Objects be the results of your
      > code.

      Excellent point.

      > Second coding-style does not neccessarily equate identical solution ...
      > TIMTOWDI is the essence of Refactoring. Refactoring expands, and "codefies"
      > if you will the idea of TIMTOWDI ... if your code is icky you find another
      > less icky way to code it.

      I like this. One of the points I try to make in the refactoring
      chapter is that every refactoring has and equally valid converse.
      I'll try to work in TIMTOWDI in this chapter.

      > This is my tuppence ... for what it's worth.

      It's weight in gold, thanks.

      Rob
    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.