Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Re: [existlist] Re: Wikileaks on the pharoah

Expand Messages
  • eupraxis@aol.com
    ... Ha. Yeah, maybe an insider. ... From: William To: existlist Sent: Sun, Jan 30, 2011 10:06 pm
    Message 1 of 12 , Jan 31, 2011
    • 0 Attachment
      > Wil, dedicated or crazy? Bill

      Ha. Yeah, maybe an insider.







      -----Original Message-----
      From: William <v.valleywestdental@...>
      To: existlist <existlist@yahoogroups.com>
      Sent: Sun, Jan 30, 2011 10:06 pm
      Subject: [existlist] Re: Wikileaks on the pharoah







      --- In existlist@yahoogroups.com, eupraxis@... wrote:
      >
      >
      > What we have to wait for from the NYT is a dedicated correspondent actually on the ground.
      >
      > Wil
      > Wil, dedicated or crazy? Bill
      >
      >
      >
      >
      >
      > -----Original Message-----
      > From: William <v.valleywestdental@...>
      > To: existlist <existlist@yahoogroups.com>
      > Sent: Sun, Jan 30, 2011 3:51 pm
      > Subject: [existlist] Re: Wikileaks on the pharoah
      >
      >
      >
      >
      >
      >
      >
      > --- In existlist@yahoogroups.com, eupraxis@ wrote:
      > >
      > > Political leanings aside, Bill Keller always shills for US middle east policy, including the Iraq War, etc.
      > >
      > > Wil
      > >Perhaps it is because he is an American. You might listen to Hillary,Obama and yes the Senator from Arazona. They know this has potential to move in a very many directions. Sure Mccain is a war hawk but even that old war lord is being cautious. Senator Paul jumped right in and ask for reduction of aid to Israel. I wonder what Tom thinks about that.
      > I might not side with Keller about the wars but at a time when there is great unease I would like to hear a clear American perspective. It seems Keller was in the meetings with the national security agencys and I would trust the press before the spooks.
      > The Shaw of Iran was a slimey dictator, Saddam was a slimey dictator and Mobarik is no better. In doing business with them we avoided total war in the area. Now is a time when another one bites the dust and I would be more happy to see it play out in the streets than in oil company board rooms.This is a huge and enticing world problem that involves us all.Big history,big decisions. Bill
      > >
      > >
      > >
      > >
      > > -----Original Message-----
      > > From: William <v.valleywestdental@>
      > > To: existlist <existlist@yahoogroups.com>
      > > Sent: Sun, Jan 30, 2011 3:07 pm
      > > Subject: [existlist] Re: Wikileaks on the pharoah
      > >
      > >
      > >
      > >
      > >
      > >
      > >
      > > --- In existlist@yahoogroups.com, eupraxis@ wrote:
      > > >
      > > >
      > > > The article was equivocal, at best, but let us remember that the author is Bill Keller, who is not particularly credible on mid-east issues.
      > > >
      > > >
      > > > Wil
      > > > Wil, I hope you admit the article was full of facts regarding this wikileaks business. It gave me a look at process and delt more with first amendment issues than mid east theory. If you have a conspiracy theory take it up with the NYT, it is not my turn to protect them. Is "The guardian" leftist enough for you, they have their own narration of the situation. What do they say? Bill
      > > >
      > > >
      > > >
      > > > -----Original Message-----
      > > > From: William <v.valleywestdental@>
      > > > To: existlist <existlist@yahoogroups.com>
      > > > Sent: Sun, Jan 30, 2011 2:34 pm
      > > > Subject: [existlist] Wikileaks on the pharoah
      > > >
      > > >
      > > >
      > > >
      > > >
      > > > In todays NYT there is a long article concerning The Times part in the security leaks . This matter is coming to light and it is a long but fascinating tale that should be read if you wish to continue to understand the world as it functions today.
      > > > The strange man, Assange, is profiled in the times article and the diplomatic leaks are being blaimed for the revolt in Tunusia thus opening the gates of revolt in Egypt. This is very fast moving and The Times writer admits there is open room for error. A key hole was opened into sources that were previously closed and the knowledge is causing unsuspedted consequences in various places. Will Yemen and Iran ignite?
      > > > Diplomatic channels remain active as Assange has dropped NYT,Das Spiegal and The Guardian because they redacted his material for various reasons. Taliban is said to be going through the material for names of western sympathysers. Assange thinks he will be assinated in a US prison. I think of the Suez canal and world commodity prices. The wikileaks exposed the "Priority access" that the Pharoah granted the US in use of Suez.
      > > > There is a reallignment of world economics ,diplomatic alliances and international politics. I find it fascinating,complex and worthy of attention if not trepedation. It is a time for broad thinking existentialism . Where to meet and where the rocks of revolution can be stashed can be tweeted but why those rocks should be flung is a much more complex matter. Bill
      > > >
      > > >
      > > >
      > > >
      > > >
      > > >
      > > >
      > > >
      > > >
      > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
      > > >
      > >
      > >
      > >
      > >
      > >
      > >
      > >
      > >
      > >
      > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
      > >
      >
      >
      >
      >
      >
      >
      >
      >
      >
      > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
      >









      [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.