Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

The Poets' Rebellion - Lautréamont and Banality

Expand Messages
  • Mary Jo
    As promised, here s the link. http://blog.myspace.com/index.cfm? fuseaction=blog.view&friendID=230519536&blogID=305091983 Mary
    Message 1 of 6 , Aug 30, 2007
    • 0 Attachment
      As promised, here's the link.

      http://blog.myspace.com/index.cfm?
      fuseaction=blog.view&friendID=230519536&blogID=305091983

      Mary
    • eupraxis@aol.com
      Thanks so much. WS ... From: Mary Jo To: existlist@yahoogroups.com Sent: Thu, 30 Aug 2007 10:47 am Subject: [existlist] The Poets
      Message 2 of 6 , Aug 30, 2007
      • 0 Attachment
        Thanks so much.

        WS







        -----Original Message-----
        From: Mary Jo <maryjo.malo@...>
        To: existlist@yahoogroups.com
        Sent: Thu, 30 Aug 2007 10:47 am
        Subject: [existlist] The Poets' Rebellion - Lautréamont and Banality

























        As promised, here's the link.



        http://blog.myspace.com/index.cfm?

        fuseaction=blog.view&friendID=230519536&blogID=305091983



        Mary





















        ________________________________________________________________________
        Email and AIM finally together. You've gotta check out free AOL Mail! - http://mail.aol.com


        [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
      • Mary Jo
        You re very welcome. MJ
        Message 3 of 6 , Aug 30, 2007
        • 0 Attachment
          You're very welcome.

          MJ

          --- In existlist@yahoogroups.com, eupraxis@... wrote:

          > Thanks so much.
        • Trinidad Cruz
          If I consider all facts to be synthetic, and any at hand assessment of a general physical functionalism to be both caused by and causal of synthetic facts
          Message 4 of 6 , Sep 2, 2007
          • 0 Attachment
            If I consider all facts to be synthetic, and any at hand assessment of
            a general physical functionalism to be both caused by and causal of
            synthetic facts within the limits of a dynamic synchronization of
            synthetic facts such as a human species, I must consider that the
            synchronization is held to some limit by some synthetic situation, or
            there would be no human species. Classic existentialist distinctions
            like subjective and objective are inadequate terms for any
            consideration of this constraining synthetic situation; and
            propositions such as God on the one hand, or evolution on the other
            hand, even if they could be obtained within distinctions like
            subjective and objective, still assume to the idea of a universal
            functionalism assessable in some set of human mental terms. It is not
            that science or religion are essentially fallacious; they both simply
            attain to the narrow paradigm of their propositions. Both seek to
            achieve what is already being done - control the reaction of synthetic
            facts within the human condition in order to assess, understand, and
            facilitate some greater or better retention of the human condition
            through inter-reaction. Synthetic facts in relation to human
            assessment in mental terms are reactive. Human assessment itself is
            reactive, in fact, better described as inter-reactive with every
            synthetic fact within the constraint of the synthetic situation that
            is imposing the synchronization of synthetic facts that is its
            accessible assessable existence. It is more than likely that existence
            in human terms was arrived at serendipitously, but it is also
            unavoidable that those human terms can only exist within a
            constraining synchronization of synthetic facts in human terms.

            Metaphysics has always employed an analytical apparatus, that
            regardless of the field of proposition or definition, finds its edges
            of field, its out of bounds, or its placeholders to be propositions
            that are not definable such as: absolute nothing, or absolute
            desolation. There are several things wrong with this approach to any
            metaphysical propositions. At the outset there is an assumption to a
            whole that cannot arguably exist - it may exist, but its existence
            cannot be supported as there are no arguments for its existence that
            are not fallacy. I may argue that any "something" exists; but I would
            be perpetuating a fallacy to argue that any "something" and even more
            ridiculously all "somethings" that are arguable in human mental terms
            are defined out of, or in contrast to, a field of, or a backdrop of
            "everything" or "nothing". It may prove to be so, but it is absolutely
            not arguable in human terms toward any actual meaning. It is far more
            likely that any "something" I may argue for is picked out for and by
            my human situation in its constrained situation of synchronization;
            and the backdrop against which the "something" is comprehensible in
            human terms is only a "something" that is not comprehensible in any
            human mental terms. It is better to argue that existence for humans is
            within a constraining synchronization of synthetic facts; experienced
            and analyzed because of, and within that constraining synchronization;
            against a backdrop, or contrast, of what is more than likely synthetic
            facts outside of that constraining synchronization and so beyond any
            human capacity for experience and analysis. The only absolute of any
            importance in metaphysics is: what can be argued without fallacy. All
            this in consideration; the issue that concerns me is the constraining
            synchronization of synthetic fact that is my existence; because I fear
            our species is bent on self-extermination these days. If Maldoror
            finds poetic terminus in mating a shark; it is in an attempt to escape
            the constraint of human analytical terms and consequences. For me this
            would be tantamount to mating a neo-con in a fit of rebellious
            depression. If I am human; if I am at least in step with my
            constraining situation; if I seek to preserve and/or develop it; I
            would mate a socialist.

            Trinidad
          • Mary Jo
            Not me. I d mate with Isadore Ducasse. Depressed rebels are the legitimate sons. That s the beauty of absurdity. MJ ... If Maldoror finds poetic terminus in
            Message 5 of 6 , Sep 2, 2007
            • 0 Attachment
              Not me. I'd mate with Isadore Ducasse. Depressed rebels are the
              legitimate sons. That's the beauty of absurdity.

              MJ

              --- In existlist@yahoogroups.com, "Trinidad Cruz" <TriniCruz@...> wrote:

              If Maldoror finds poetic terminus in mating a shark; it is in an
              attempt to escape the constraint of human analytical terms and
              consequences. For me this would be tantamount to mating a neo-con in a
              fit of rebellious depression. If I am human; if I am at least in step
              with my constraining situation; if I seek to preserve and/or develop
              it; I would mate a socialist.
            • Aija Veldre Beldavs
              ... wonder if classifiable as an existential act is that of 39 yr. old Brooklyn rumanian lifeguard Mariuss Mironesku who with his body shielded a baby sand
              Message 6 of 6 , Sep 6, 2007
              • 0 Attachment
                Mary Jo wrote:
                > Not me. I'd mate with Isadore Ducasse. Depressed rebels are the
                > legitimate sons. That's the beauty of absurdity.
                > MJ
                >
                > "Trinidad Cruz" <TriniCruz@...> wrote:
                >
                > If Maldoror finds poetic terminus in mating a shark; it is in an
                > attempt to escape the constraint of human analytical terms and
                > consequences. For me this would be tantamount to mating a neo-con in a fit of rebellious depression. If I am human; if I am at least in step with my constraining situation; if I seek to preserve and/or develop it; I would mate a socialist.
                >

                wonder if classifiable as an existential act is that of 39 yr. old
                Brooklyn rumanian lifeguard Mariuss Mironesku who with his body
                shielded a baby sand shark, too young to threaten humans (too young to
                mate with as well), taking it out to sea and safety, after a crowd of
                75 - 100 attacked and beat it...? :)

                aija
              Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.