Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Re: Into the cave

Expand Messages
  • Herman B. Triplegood
    I don t know. Hopefully they are not also dead, like good old K and N. Polemic can be a good thing. It serves a useful purpose. Sometimes one has to
    Message 1 of 14 , Dec 10, 2006
      I don't know. Hopefully they are not also dead, like "good old" K and
      N. Polemic can be a good thing. It serves a useful purpose. Sometimes
      one has to overstate their case to rise above the noise and be heard.
      Both K and N were pretty good at that. You take all the time you
      want. I am not in any particular hurry to get anywhere. Destinations
      can be a real drag when compared to the adventure of getting there. I
      wonder if Columbus was disappointed when he realized he wasn't in


      --- In existlist@yahoogroups.com, "louise" <hecubatoher@...> wrote:
      > Herman, I need to go very slowly, and often other philosophical
      > threads, or simply the complicating demands of living, bodily, in a
      > house made with hands, prevents my participation in the steady
      > development of argument and discussion I would like to see at this
      > list. Horrendous abuse is made of philosophical thought, and I
      > that horror keenly. So please understand the context for my
      > polemical style, even if you are baffled or repelled by its
      > content. It is not easy for men and women to recognise each
      > emotions, and interpret them correctly. Those statements are
      > prefatory to my saying this: Kierkegaard and Nietzsche are neither
      > good nor old. They are dead, but that is hardly to say anything of
      > interest. Where is everyone else, anyway? Speak. Louise
      > --- In existlist@yahoogroups.com, "Herman B. Triplegood" <hb3g@>
      > wrote:
      > >
      > > Dear Louise:
      > >
      > > Yes, please go into it further. As for me, I am right in there
      > with
      > > good old Kierkegaard and Nietzsche. The pragmatic thing to do, it
      > > seems to me, is to live your truth. This also means letting your
      > > truth live. So, it had better be a robust truth. I fully intend
      > > base my day to day conduct on rigorous philosophical reflection.
      > am
      > > not perfect. I consider myself still an apprentice. I want my
      > > philosophy to make a difference in how I live my life. I want it
      > to
      > > be existential, not dry and pedantic. I am under no illusion. I
      > know
      > > that it is not a simplistic process. I have been around for a few
      > > decades, and I have suffered as much as anybody and made as many
      > > stupid choices as anybody. It is nitty gritty. It is concrete. It
      > is
      > > even messy. But all of this does not mean it cannot be
      > > rational, spiritual, even absolute, in an unexpectedly
      > > and beautiful way. There is that cunning of reason of which Hegel
      > > speaks. It is, in some ways, bigger than we are, and we have to
      > give
      > > ourselves up to it with a certain kind of trust, even a faith of
      > > reason. I guess I am pretty much a die hard classicist when it
      > comes
      > > to reason and all of that. So, if the intention to put my
      > philosophy
      > > into concrete practice puts me in the straight jacket brigade,
      > I
      > > can say is that it is amazing to me that things have gotten so
      > turned
      > > around that it now is the insane who are locking up the sane. I
      > guess
      > > a part of it is, maybe, being a rebel. It strikes me that
      > Kierkegaard
      > > and Nietzsche, like Socrates, just didn't fit in. Neither did
      > > Schopenhauer. Socrates got treated really badly. Living the
      > examined
      > > life isn't always going with the flow. Often enough, it is going
      > > against the grain.
      > >
      > > Hb3g
    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.