Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Aija, an apoplogy

Expand Messages
  • dave minogue
    Sorry Aija, i was reading several posts that i recieved over night, i just responded to the last one i read. sorry for the confusion, i m fairly new to this
    Message 1 of 1 , Jul 30, 2005
    • 0 Attachment
      Sorry Aija, i was reading several posts that i recieved over night, i
      just responded to the last one i read. sorry for the confusion, i'm
      fairly new to this thread posting business and i just got overwhelmed...i
      hope you can find it in your heart to forgive me ;-) sorry

      ps it was actually supposed to be in response to a post by eduard and if
      i remember correctly-which i often dont- i agreed with most of the
      arguments posed by Aija in that post

      ----- Original Message -----
      From: "Aija Veldre Beldavs"
      To: existlist@yahoogroups.com
      Subject: Re: [existlist] Re: Life - better and for worse?
      Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 09:37:24 -0500 (EST)

      On Sat, 30 Jul 2005, dave minogue wrote:

      > As far as population goes, i dont think treating the problem with
      > methods such as moving them somewhere else is of any use,
      > here, be progressive and think outside the box, you dont have to go
      > far, ie: sex education, availability of contraception and if worse
      > to worse, do what the chinese did.moving people somewhere else is
      > but a short term solution to a long term problem.

      i did NOT say anything about moving populations as a solution to
      problems. my default examples are going to be the horror stories of
      history. but since it was brought up, i agree that even in the best
      scenarios moving people en masse would only be a temporary patch.

      i did talk about the role of mobility in one's significant group
      formation and how this mobility can change who is most important to
      individual. the big point here for me is that a member of another
      can (as a possibility, in theory, if not in actuality) become one of
      most important people in one's life. this very possibility
      the flexibility as opposed to rigidity of one's most significant
      group of

      also, for consciousness to develop, everyone does not have to
      in the same way or equally. critical mass in this case doesn't have
      to be
      large. this is one concrete specific way that a more global
      does evolve in addition to what was brought up before: mass media and
      virtual communications.

      the individual vs group choice, as so many other dual choices, is
      irrelevant. i see things in terms of interactions, relationships.

      i don't want to speculate if things are worse or better today because
      me the immediate question is worse or better for whom in relation to

      if it is in terms of the existence or nonsurvival of humans, once
      had spread around earth in different habitats and passed a critical
      population mass, some were bound to survive somewhere as long as life
      suitable for humans continued on earth. but today it is possible
      science and technology to either wipe out all humanity, or to go on
      as we
      were not before.


      Please support the Existential Primer... dedicated to explaining

      Home Page: http://www.tameri.com/csw/exist



      * Visit your group "existlist" on the web.

      * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:

      * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of


      For the largest FREE email in Ireland (25MB) and 20MB of online file storage space - Visit http://www.campus.ie

      [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.