Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Re: measuring intelligence & voyeurism

Expand Messages
  • Mary Jo
    Louise, It s a triple entendre. I meant it in 2 ways. We don t have to agree about everything do we? Isn t that what we re trying to accomplish, the agreement
    Message 1 of 3 , Aug 2, 2004
    • 0 Attachment
      Louise, It's a triple entendre. I meant it in 2 ways. We don't have
      to agree about everything do we? Isn't that what we're trying to
      accomplish, the agreement to disagree? I sympathize with most human
      beings. I don't agree with them about most things :-) Mary

      --- In existlist@yahoogroups.com, "louise" <hecubatoher@y...> wrote:
      > Bill, You seem to understand Mary's words better than I do. Until
      > her final words, 'getting off', I thought she was sympathising with
      > you and me. This is all getting fraught, to draw on my well-used
      > stock of understatement. I've lost count of how many times I've
      > been fried alive, so to speak, in recent weeks. I admire you,
      Bill,
      > and maybe you're wasted on those patriotic missions or whatever.
      To
      > be honest, when you first mentioned you'd been approached, I
      thought
      > you were trying to suss me out. It seemed unusual, to make a
      > statement like that on the internet, and I did begin to wonder what
      > might be coming my way. Louise
      >
      > --- In existlist@yahoogroups.com, "Mary Jo" <alcyon11@y...> wrote:
      > > I think that if one is surveilled for exercising free speech and
      > > intelligence, one is involved in a patriotic act. The surveilled,
      > not
      > > the surveillors. If I or any member of my family was in this
      > > situation, and I knew about it, I wouldn't have much trouble
      > deciding
      > > whose side I was on. Mine.
      > >
      > > getting off,
      > > Mary
    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.