Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.
 

RE: [existlist] Lusa the Increasingly Annoying

Expand Messages
  • C. S. Wyatt
    Lusa should now be gone... I sometimes ponder why people need so much help. Personal responsibility seems to be a good topic for discussion. As a retail store
    Message 1 of 22 , Apr 3, 2001
      Lusa should now be gone...

      I sometimes ponder why people need so much help. Personal responsibility
      seems to be a good topic for discussion. As a retail store owner, I'm amazed
      by people on a daily basis.

      - C. S. Wyatt
      http://www.tameri.com A site for writers
      http://www.tameri.com/csw My home on the web

      I am what I am at this moment, not what I was and certainly not all that I
      shall be.
    • Linda Jordan
      But do you think that is human nature? To need help? Not sure I do. Cuz not everyone needs help or at least some profess not to. Like your closing thought,
      Message 2 of 22 , Apr 3, 2001
        But do you think that is human nature? To need help? Not sure I do. Cuz
        not everyone needs help or at least some profess not to. Like your closing
        thought, C. S. Wyatt. Rather similar to the following: No doubt our
        accepting what we are must always inhibit our being what we ought to be.
        John Fowles said that, you know "The Magus" and "The Maggot." I think "The
        Collector" too.

        Asked the question whether anyone believes in human nature because some
        existentialists say that (I say some because I am not familiar with them
        ALL). Just wondering if one can be of existentialist leanings and believe
        in human nature.



        >From: "C. S. Wyatt" <cswyatt@...>
        >Reply-To: existlist@yahoogroups.com
        >To: <existlist@yahoogroups.com>
        >Subject: RE: [existlist] Lusa the Increasingly Annoying
        >Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2001 19:54:41 -0700
        >
        >Lusa should now be gone...
        >
        >I sometimes ponder why people need so much help. Personal responsibility
        >seems to be a good topic for discussion. As a retail store owner, I'm
        >amazed
        >by people on a daily basis.
        >
        >- C. S. Wyatt
        >http://www.tameri.com A site for writers
        >http://www.tameri.com/csw My home on the web
        >
        >I am what I am at this moment, not what I was and certainly not all that I
        >shall be.
        >

        _________________________________________________________________
        Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
      • Edward Alf
        Linda et al, i dont think that Chris is saying that it is the nature of humans to need help ... but rather that he has noticed a lack of personal
        Message 3 of 22 , Apr 3, 2001
          Linda et al,

          i dont think that Chris is saying that it is the nature of humans to need
          help ... but rather that he has noticed a lack of personal responsibility ..
          . well that is the way im interpreting it ...

          i think that one could have an inclination towards existentialism and still
          believe in human nature ... if only for reason that humans have a nature and
          one might as well believe that this is the case ... but human nature covers
          a wealth of characteristics ... which ones are we speaking of in relation to
          existentialism? ... there is a human characteristic which is a desire to
          hope for the best ... but i should think that hope in this sense is
          contradicted, since the concept of existentialism is that one makes one's
          own world by particular choices ... of course i suppose that one can still
          be stoic about making choices and yet have hopes ...

          anyway, the difficulty is that existentialism can have a variety of criteria
          within its philosophy and human nature has a wide range of characteristics
          .. which ones fit or dont fit with which ... wow, look at me, it is almost
          as if i knew what i was talking about ...

          im now into Odinism ... time to go to sleep and think about this .. see if i
          wake up with some solution to my spiritual quest ...

          the ottawa river is still covered with ice ... it will take a few more weeks
          ... im optimistic that i wont miss the breakup this year ... i should think
          that one of these days the temperature will get above 10c ....

          have fun ..

          eduard

          ----- Original Message -----
          From: "Linda Jordan" <tustna@...>
          To: <existlist@yahoogroups.com>
          Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2001 11:16 PM
          Subject: RE: [existlist] Lusa the Increasingly Annoying


          > But do you think that is human nature? To need help? Not sure I do. Cuz
          > not everyone needs help or at least some profess not to. Like your
          closing
          > thought, C. S. Wyatt. Rather similar to the following: No doubt our
          > accepting what we are must always inhibit our being what we ought to be.
          > John Fowles said that, you know "The Magus" and "The Maggot." I think
          "The
          > Collector" too.
          >
          > Asked the question whether anyone believes in human nature because some
          > existentialists say that (I say some because I am not familiar with them
          > ALL). Just wondering if one can be of existentialist leanings and believe
          > in human nature.
        • Linda Jordan
          Human condition to hope for the best? I think not. One could consider the criminally insane. One could say that these folks hope for the best I suppose but
          Message 4 of 22 , Apr 3, 2001
            Human condition to hope for the best? I think not. One could consider the
            criminally insane. One could say that these folks hope for the best I
            suppose but what is their best--to have their crime go undetected? --to wish
            for the shortest sentence? One could also consider those human beings who
            are otherwise flawed--for instance, those who are afflicted with some kind
            of mental retardation. Do they hope for the best? How do we know? How do
            we judge people who by predisposition think differently than the rest? Not
            sure about any of this. All questions, to me at least, worthy of thought.


            >From: "Edward Alf" <ealf@...>
            >Reply-To: existlist@yahoogroups.com
            >To: <existlist@yahoogroups.com>
            >Subject: Re: [existlist] Lusa the Increasingly Annoying
            >Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2001 00:02:17 -0400
            >
            >Linda et al,
            >
            >i dont think that Chris is saying that it is the nature of humans to need
            >help ... but rather that he has noticed a lack of personal responsibility
            >..
            >. well that is the way im interpreting it ...
            >
            >i think that one could have an inclination towards existentialism and still
            >believe in human nature ... if only for reason that humans have a nature
            >and
            >one might as well believe that this is the case ... but human nature covers
            >a wealth of characteristics ... which ones are we speaking of in relation
            >to
            >existentialism? ... there is a human characteristic which is a desire to
            >hope for the best ... but i should think that hope in this sense is
            >contradicted, since the concept of existentialism is that one makes one's
            >own world by particular choices ... of course i suppose that one can still
            >be stoic about making choices and yet have hopes ...
            >
            >anyway, the difficulty is that existentialism can have a variety of
            >criteria
            >within its philosophy and human nature has a wide range of characteristics
            >.. which ones fit or dont fit with which ... wow, look at me, it is almost
            >as if i knew what i was talking about ...
            >
            >im now into Odinism ... time to go to sleep and think about this .. see if
            >i
            >wake up with some solution to my spiritual quest ...
            >
            >the ottawa river is still covered with ice ... it will take a few more
            >weeks
            >... im optimistic that i wont miss the breakup this year ... i should think
            >that one of these days the temperature will get above 10c ....
            >
            >have fun ..
            >
            >eduard
            >
            >----- Original Message -----
            >From: "Linda Jordan" <tustna@...>
            >To: <existlist@yahoogroups.com>
            >Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2001 11:16 PM
            >Subject: RE: [existlist] Lusa the Increasingly Annoying
            >
            >
            > > But do you think that is human nature? To need help? Not sure I do.
            >Cuz
            > > not everyone needs help or at least some profess not to. Like your
            >closing
            > > thought, C. S. Wyatt. Rather similar to the following: No doubt our
            > > accepting what we are must always inhibit our being what we ought to be.
            > > John Fowles said that, you know "The Magus" and "The Maggot." I think
            >"The
            > > Collector" too.
            > >
            > > Asked the question whether anyone believes in human nature because some
            > > existentialists say that (I say some because I am not familiar with them
            > > ALL). Just wondering if one can be of existentialist leanings and
            >believe
            > > in human nature.
            >
            >
            >

            _________________________________________________________________
            Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
          • C. S. Wyatt
            I believe people naturally seek pleasure and are self-serving. Curiously, some people are wired through nature or nurture (though free will allows us to
            Message 5 of 22 , Apr 4, 2001
              I believe people "naturally" seek pleasure and are self-serving. Curiously,
              some people are "wired" through nature or nurture (though free will allows
              us to change) to enjoy pain and/or destruction. Even saints are
              self-serving, Augustine argued. There is the hope of eternal life -- and
              nothing is more self-serving than eternal life.

              In my worldview, I want a well-educated populous and a stable government.
              These are self-serving because I cannot perform certain tasks, such as
              dental work or internal medicine. I compromise some freedoms to exist in a
              society -- a choice I make actively each day. This society, for the most
              part, meets my needs.

              I am selfish and pleasure-seeking. However, my "selfishness" is along the
              lines of Adam Smith. (I own two businesses -- a bookstore and a publishing
              consultancy.) For Sartre, selfishness meant embracing socialism with its
              promise of meeting essential needs. We know how he sought pleasure.

              On the personal responsibility issue -- I believe laziness is all too common
              in society. People aren't willing to work to obtain what they want. A true
              pleasure seeker is willing to overcome minor obstacles -- like work -- to
              obtain what they want.

              - C. S. Wyatt
              http://www.tameri.com A site for writers
              http://www.tameri.com/csw My home on the web

              I am what I am at this moment, not what I was and certainly not all that I
              shall be.
            • mi yoo
              Are you saying people are naturally psychological egotists? Do you really think some people derive pleasure from abusing and torturing their body and mind? Do
              Message 6 of 22 , Apr 5, 2001
                Are you saying people are naturally psychological egotists? Do you really
                think some people derive pleasure from abusing and torturing their body and
                mind? Do you equate pleasure with happiness?


                >From: "C. S. Wyatt" <cswyatt@...>
                >Reply-To: existlist@yahoogroups.com
                >To: <existlist@yahoogroups.com>
                >Subject: RE: [existlist] Human Nature
                >Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2001 22:24:25 -0700
                >
                >I believe people "naturally" seek pleasure and are self-serving. Curiously,
                >some people are "wired" through nature or nurture (though free will allows
                >us to change) to enjoy pain and/or destruction. Even saints are
                >self-serving, Augustine argued. There is the hope of eternal life -- and
                >nothing is more self-serving than eternal life.
                >
                >In my worldview, I want a well-educated populous and a stable government.
                >These are self-serving because I cannot perform certain tasks, such as
                >dental work or internal medicine. I compromise some freedoms to exist in a
                >society -- a choice I make actively each day. This society, for the most
                >part, meets my needs.
                >
                >I am selfish and pleasure-seeking. However, my "selfishness" is along the
                >lines of Adam Smith. (I own two businesses -- a bookstore and a publishing
                >consultancy.) For Sartre, selfishness meant embracing socialism with its
                >promise of meeting essential needs. We know how he sought pleasure.
                >
                >On the personal responsibility issue -- I believe laziness is all too
                >common
                >in society. People aren't willing to work to obtain what they want. A true
                >pleasure seeker is willing to overcome minor obstacles -- like work -- to
                >obtain what they want.
                >
                >- C. S. Wyatt
                >http://www.tameri.com A site for writers
                >http://www.tameri.com/csw My home on the web
                >
                >I am what I am at this moment, not what I was and certainly not all that I
                >shall be.
                >
                >

                _________________________________________________________________
                Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
              • C. S. Wyatt
                Yes, I suppose I am stating that people are egotists. It has been said that to understand what a man is, watch a child. I see many children, and in a previous
                Message 7 of 22 , Apr 5, 2001
                  Yes, I suppose I am stating that people are egotists. It has been said that
                  to understand what a man is, watch a child. I see many children, and in a
                  previous life taught.

                  Children are extremely selfish... and not only the human ones. I think men
                  are also selfish, and self-centered. Many assume the world revolves around
                  them. It's difficult not to think that way when life appears to be an
                  interactive movie in front of you. We can only see ourselves in mirrors.

                  I decide who and what I will be, but to do so I must realize my "natural"
                  state and overcome it. We each have weaknesses we choose to overcome,
                  overlook, or integrate into our being. I know that I know and understand
                  very little about myself and others. However, many people seem to think they
                  know quite a bit. People are the their own "centers" of existence.

                  Then again, I'm certain I drive my Jeep with a cloaking device, making it
                  impossible for poeple with cell phones to see my vehicle in front of them!


                  - C. S. Wyatt
                  http://www.tameri.com A site for writers
                  http://www.tameri.com/csw My home on the web

                  I am what I am at this moment, not what I was and certainly not all that I
                  shall be.

                  > -----Original Message-----
                  > Are you saying people are naturally psychological egotists? Do you really
                  > think some people derive pleasure from abusing and torturing
                  > their body and
                  > mind? Do you equate pleasure with happiness?
                • Linda Jordan
                  Two statements you made: We only see ourselves in mirrors. AND people are their own centers of existence. The first I don t entirely agree with. I would say
                  Message 8 of 22 , Apr 5, 2001
                    Two statements you made: We only see ourselves in mirrors. AND people are
                    their own centers of existence.

                    The first I don't entirely agree with. I would say that younger people tend
                    to see themselves only in mirrors. Expect some rambling... As I have gotten
                    older, I have become far more self-reliant and self-aware, thereby
                    permitting me to no longer rely on "mirrors" (others) quite as much.
                    Mirrors are useful though. However, they reflect only those things we
                    choose to see in them. I have lost a lot of weight recently. I am the same
                    person. I am now getting more attention due to the weight loss, from both
                    men and women. Therefore, syllogism-wise, the attention I am getting
                    currently results from this weight loss. (Of course, I'm probably more
                    self-confident as well, this perhaps causing more people to be drawn to me.)
                    Regardless, this kind of pisses me off. As would be expected.

                    This statement seems to apply to you particularly. You mention business
                    ownership, jeep, wanting others to know that you perhaps have money. You
                    mention many writers, philosophers, etc., wanting others to know you are
                    well-read and a thinker. These things are important to you. And you want
                    others to realize this. The mirroring desire here is very clear. Know what
                    I mean?

                    Next statement: People are the centers of their existences. People are the
                    centers of their existences, if they are honest/mature enough to admit it.
                    As you probably have come to realize, this self-existence centeredness does
                    not have to be self-centeredness in the usual sense of the word. A positive
                    self-centeredness is possible and desirable.

                    Your two statements are almost contradictory. Almost. Needing validation
                    from the world is very useful at times of course. However, if we are truly
                    centered in ourselves, we wouldn't need that validation. There must be some
                    balance, I believe. If, in our self-reliance, we find support for our
                    beliefs, values, etc., then our self-concept is reinforced and therefore
                    stronger.

                    Hell, I don't know. These thoughts are wonderful. I am currently
                    unemployed. I am reading/writing a lot more these days. My life
                    objectively is pretty lousy. But having these kinds of ideas to think about
                    is wonderful and somehow sustains me.

                    >From: "C. S. Wyatt" <cswyatt@...>
                    >Reply-To: existlist@yahoogroups.com
                    >To: <existlist@yahoogroups.com>
                    >Subject: RE: [existlist] Human Nature
                    >Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2001 00:21:15 -0700
                    >
                    >Yes, I suppose I am stating that people are egotists. It has been said that
                    >to understand what a man is, watch a child. I see many children, and in a
                    >previous life taught.
                    >
                    >Children are extremely selfish... and not only the human ones. I think men
                    >are also selfish, and self-centered. Many assume the world revolves around
                    >them. It's difficult not to think that way when life appears to be an
                    >interactive movie in front of you. We can only see ourselves in mirrors.
                    >
                    >I decide who and what I will be, but to do so I must realize my "natural"
                    >state and overcome it. We each have weaknesses we choose to overcome,
                    >overlook, or integrate into our being. I know that I know and understand
                    >very little about myself and others. However, many people seem to think
                    >they
                    >know quite a bit. People are the their own "centers" of existence.
                    >
                    >Then again, I'm certain I drive my Jeep with a cloaking device, making it
                    >impossible for poeple with cell phones to see my vehicle in front of them!
                    >
                    >
                    >- C. S. Wyatt
                    >http://www.tameri.com A site for writers
                    >http://www.tameri.com/csw My home on the web
                    >
                    >I am what I am at this moment, not what I was and certainly not all that I
                    >shall be.
                    >
                    > > -----Original Message-----
                    > > Are you saying people are naturally psychological egotists? Do you
                    >really
                    > > think some people derive pleasure from abusing and torturing
                    > > their body and
                    > > mind? Do you equate pleasure with happiness?
                    >

                    _________________________________________________________________
                    Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
                  • thebookdoc@aol.com
                    As I am a bit of a skeptic, and though I like to try not to skoff (as stupid as I am), I am curious as to if this was a
                    Message 9 of 22 , Apr 5, 2001
                      <<...and in a previous life taught.>>

                      As I am a bit of a skeptic, and though I like to try not to skoff (as
                      stupid as I am), I am curious as to if this was a genuine
                      perspective, and was wondering how there is any proof of this, if so,
                      beside what you fictionalize as memory.

                      I have watched people's memories grow before my eyes and wonder if I
                      am as champion at altering my perspective and vision of my
                      'character.' I assume I am, which leaves frail possibility of current
                      reality -- and past even less so.

                      Richard
                    • Linda Jordan
                      I don t think he was referring to having been reincarnated. I think that earlier in THIS life he was a teacher. Am I right, original writer? ...
                      Message 10 of 22 , Apr 5, 2001
                        I don't think he was referring to having been reincarnated. I think that
                        earlier in THIS life he was a teacher. Am I right, original writer?


                        >From: thebookdoc@...
                        >Reply-To: existlist@yahoogroups.com
                        >To: existlist@yahoogroups.com
                        >Subject: [existlist] Re: Human Nature, the creation of foibles, and passing
                        >by dilusions as if gases
                        >Date: Thu, 05 Apr 2001 14:04:52 -0000
                        >
                        ><<...and in a previous life taught.>>
                        >
                        >As I am a bit of a skeptic, and though I like to try not to skoff (as
                        >stupid as I am), I am curious as to if this was a genuine
                        >perspective, and was wondering how there is any proof of this, if so,
                        >beside what you fictionalize as memory.
                        >
                        >I have watched people's memories grow before my eyes and wonder if I
                        >am as champion at altering my perspective and vision of my
                        >'character.' I assume I am, which leaves frail possibility of current
                        >reality -- and past even less so.
                        >
                        >Richard
                        >

                        _________________________________________________________________
                        Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
                      • Bill Harris
                        Americas philosopher, president postulated we have a right to life liberty and the persuit of hapiness. What a complex and revolutinary concept ,carried in so
                        Message 11 of 22 , Apr 5, 2001
                          Americas philosopher, president postulated we have a right to life liberty
                          and the persuit of hapiness. What a complex and revolutinary concept
                          ,carried in so few words. The biologic imperative demands that we are born
                          ,we reproduce, we die. The individual contracts with society for mutual
                          benefit. The government acts as arbitrer of this contract through the
                          construct of law. Assigning a value to various labors has been an ongoing
                          problem. The emergence of lazy parasitic social classes has destroied the
                          work ethic in countless societies , tribes and clans. Perhaps philosophy
                          must shoulder the responsibility of providing a framework of values from
                          wich the labors of the individual will be compensated by society.
                          ----- Original Message -----
                          From: C. S. Wyatt <cswyatt@...>
                          To: <existlist@yahoogroups.com>
                          Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2001 12:24 AM
                          Subject: RE: [existlist] Human Nature


                          > I believe people "naturally" seek pleasure and are self-serving.
                          Curiously,
                          > some people are "wired" through nature or nurture (though free will
                          allows
                          > us to change) to enjoy pain and/or destruction. Even saints are
                          > self-serving, Augustine argued. There is the hope of eternal life -- and
                          > nothing is more self-serving than eternal life.
                          >
                          > In my worldview, I want a well-educated populous and a stable government.
                          > These are self-serving because I cannot perform certain tasks, such as
                          > dental work or internal medicine. I compromise some freedoms to exist in a
                          > society -- a choice I make actively each day. This society, for the most
                          > part, meets my needs.
                          >
                          > I am selfish and pleasure-seeking. However, my "selfishness" is along the
                          > lines of Adam Smith. (I own two businesses -- a bookstore and a publishing
                          > consultancy.) For Sartre, selfishness meant embracing socialism with its
                          > promise of meeting essential needs. We know how he sought pleasure.
                          >
                          > On the personal responsibility issue -- I believe laziness is all too
                          common
                          > in society. People aren't willing to work to obtain what they want. A true
                          > pleasure seeker is willing to overcome minor obstacles -- like work -- to
                          > obtain what they want.
                          >
                          > - C. S. Wyatt
                          > http://www.tameri.com A site for writers
                          > http://www.tameri.com/csw My home on the web
                          >
                          > I am what I am at this moment, not what I was and certainly not all that I
                          > shall be.
                          >
                          >
                          >
                          >
                          > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
                          > existlist-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
                          >
                          >
                          >
                          > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
                          >
                        • Linda Jordan
                          RIGHT ON, BILL! ... _________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
                          Message 12 of 22 , Apr 5, 2001
                            RIGHT ON, BILL!


                            >From: "Bill Harris" <bhvwd@...>
                            >Reply-To: existlist@yahoogroups.com
                            >To: <existlist@yahoogroups.com>
                            >Subject: Re: [existlist] Human Nature
                            >Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2001 12:36:16 -0500
                            >
                            >Americas philosopher, president postulated we have a right to life liberty
                            >and the persuit of hapiness. What a complex and revolutinary concept
                            >,carried in so few words. The biologic imperative demands that we are born
                            >,we reproduce, we die. The individual contracts with society for mutual
                            >benefit. The government acts as arbitrer of this contract through the
                            >construct of law. Assigning a value to various labors has been an ongoing
                            >problem. The emergence of lazy parasitic social classes has destroied the
                            >work ethic in countless societies , tribes and clans. Perhaps philosophy
                            >must shoulder the responsibility of providing a framework of values from
                            >wich the labors of the individual will be compensated by society.
                            >----- Original Message -----
                            >From: C. S. Wyatt <cswyatt@...>
                            >To: <existlist@yahoogroups.com>
                            >Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2001 12:24 AM
                            >Subject: RE: [existlist] Human Nature
                            >
                            >
                            > > I believe people "naturally" seek pleasure and are self-serving.
                            >Curiously,
                            > > some people are "wired" through nature or nurture (though free will
                            >allows
                            > > us to change) to enjoy pain and/or destruction. Even saints are
                            > > self-serving, Augustine argued. There is the hope of eternal life -- and
                            > > nothing is more self-serving than eternal life.
                            > >
                            > > In my worldview, I want a well-educated populous and a stable
                            >government.
                            > > These are self-serving because I cannot perform certain tasks, such as
                            > > dental work or internal medicine. I compromise some freedoms to exist in
                            >a
                            > > society -- a choice I make actively each day. This society, for the most
                            > > part, meets my needs.
                            > >
                            > > I am selfish and pleasure-seeking. However, my "selfishness" is along
                            >the
                            > > lines of Adam Smith. (I own two businesses -- a bookstore and a
                            >publishing
                            > > consultancy.) For Sartre, selfishness meant embracing socialism with its
                            > > promise of meeting essential needs. We know how he sought pleasure.
                            > >
                            > > On the personal responsibility issue -- I believe laziness is all too
                            >common
                            > > in society. People aren't willing to work to obtain what they want. A
                            >true
                            > > pleasure seeker is willing to overcome minor obstacles -- like work --
                            >to
                            > > obtain what they want.
                            > >
                            > > - C. S. Wyatt
                            > > http://www.tameri.com A site for writers
                            > > http://www.tameri.com/csw My home on the web
                            > >
                            > > I am what I am at this moment, not what I was and certainly not all that
                            >I
                            > > shall be.
                            > >
                            > >
                            > >
                            > >
                            > > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
                            > > existlist-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
                            > >
                            > >
                            > >
                            > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
                            >http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
                            > >
                            >

                            _________________________________________________________________
                            Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
                          • Edward Alf
                            Chris et Folks, i have been out of circulation for the past few days ... it will take a while to get through all the messages ... i can only answer some ...
                            Message 13 of 22 , Apr 8, 2001
                              Chris et Folks,

                              i have been out of circulation for the past few days ... it will take a
                              while to get through all the messages ... i can only answer some ...

                              selfishness is one of those words which has taken a beating in the public
                              mind ... all action is selfish if we want a result ... even an action which
                              we would want to be taken as unselfish is in a sense selfish ... it is good
                              to be selfish ...

                              eduard

                              ----- Original Message -----
                              From: "C. S. Wyatt" <cswyatt@...>
                              To: <existlist@yahoogroups.com>
                              Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2001 1:24 AM
                              Subject: RE: [existlist] Human Nature


                              > I believe people "naturally" seek pleasure and are self-serving.
                              Curiously,
                              > some people are "wired" through nature or nurture (though free will
                              allows
                              > us to change) to enjoy pain and/or destruction. Even saints are
                              > self-serving, Augustine argued. There is the hope of eternal life -- and
                              > nothing is more self-serving than eternal life.
                              >
                              > In my worldview, I want a well-educated populous and a stable government.
                              > These are self-serving because I cannot perform certain tasks, such as
                              > dental work or internal medicine. I compromise some freedoms to exist in a
                              > society -- a choice I make actively each day. This society, for the most
                              > part, meets my needs.
                              >
                              > I am selfish and pleasure-seeking. However, my "selfishness" is along the
                              > lines of Adam Smith. (I own two businesses -- a bookstore and a publishing
                              > consultancy.) For Sartre, selfishness meant embracing socialism with its
                              > promise of meeting essential needs. We know how he sought pleasure.
                              >
                              > On the personal responsibility issue -- I believe laziness is all too
                              common
                              > in society. People aren't willing to work to obtain what they want. A true
                              > pleasure seeker is willing to overcome minor obstacles -- like work -- to
                              > obtain what they want.
                              >
                              > - C. S. Wyatt
                              > http://www.tameri.com A site for writers
                              > http://www.tameri.com/csw My home on the web
                              >
                              > I am what I am at this moment, not what I was and certainly not all that I
                              > shall be.
                              >
                              >
                              >
                              >
                              > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
                              > existlist-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
                              >
                              >
                              >
                              > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
                              >
                              >
                              >
                            • Edward Alf
                              mi you and all, it is easy to find some extreme ... i think the point is that there is a desire for pleasure ... and pleasure can mean happiness ... this is an
                              Message 14 of 22 , Apr 8, 2001
                                mi you and all,

                                it is easy to find some extreme ... i think the point is that there is a
                                desire for pleasure ... and pleasure can mean happiness ... this is an
                                ordinary and very human (i could extend it to non-human as well) quest ...
                                why get into psychological egotists (whatever that is)? ...

                                however if you wish to get into it ... one could argue that the person who
                                abuses and tortures their body is seeking after something which is their own
                                definition of pleasure ... and they in doing so, they are also seeking
                                happiness by their definition ... whatever rock your boat ...

                                eduard

                                ----- Original Message -----
                                From: "mi yoo" <mihwa12@...>
                                To: <existlist@yahoogroups.com>
                                Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2001 3:07 AM
                                Subject: RE: [existlist] Human Nature


                                > Are you saying people are naturally psychological egotists? Do you really
                                > think some people derive pleasure from abusing and torturing their body
                                and
                                > mind? Do you equate pleasure with happiness?
                                >
                                >
                                > >From: "C. S. Wyatt" <cswyatt@...>
                                > >Reply-To: existlist@yahoogroups.com
                                > >To: <existlist@yahoogroups.com>
                                > >Subject: RE: [existlist] Human Nature
                                > >Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2001 22:24:25 -0700
                                > >
                                > >I believe people "naturally" seek pleasure and are self-serving.
                                Curiously,
                                > >some people are "wired" through nature or nurture (though free will
                                allows
                                > >us to change) to enjoy pain and/or destruction. Even saints are
                                > >self-serving, Augustine argued. There is the hope of eternal life -- and
                                > >nothing is more self-serving than eternal life.
                                > >
                                > >In my worldview, I want a well-educated populous and a stable government.
                                > >These are self-serving because I cannot perform certain tasks, such as
                                > >dental work or internal medicine. I compromise some freedoms to exist in
                                a
                                > >society -- a choice I make actively each day. This society, for the most
                                > >part, meets my needs.
                                > >
                                > >I am selfish and pleasure-seeking. However, my "selfishness" is along the
                                > >lines of Adam Smith. (I own two businesses -- a bookstore and a
                                publishing
                                > >consultancy.) For Sartre, selfishness meant embracing socialism with its
                                > >promise of meeting essential needs. We know how he sought pleasure.
                                > >
                                > >On the personal responsibility issue -- I believe laziness is all too
                                > >common
                                > >in society. People aren't willing to work to obtain what they want. A
                                true
                                > >pleasure seeker is willing to overcome minor obstacles -- like work -- to
                                > >obtain what they want.
                                > >
                                > >- C. S. Wyatt
                                > >http://www.tameri.com A site for writers
                                > >http://www.tameri.com/csw My home on the web
                                > >
                                > >I am what I am at this moment, not what I was and certainly not all that
                                I
                                > >shall be.
                                > >
                                > >
                                >
                                > _________________________________________________________________
                                > Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
                                >
                                >
                                >
                                > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
                                > existlist-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
                                >
                                >
                                >
                                > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
                                >
                                >
                              • Edward Alf
                                Bill et folks, i should hardly think that the concept of liberty and the pursuit of happiness was unknown until stated by an american president .... eduard ...
                                Message 15 of 22 , Apr 8, 2001
                                  Bill et folks,

                                  i should hardly think that the concept of liberty and the pursuit of
                                  happiness was unknown until stated by an american president ....

                                  eduard


                                  ----- Original Message -----
                                  From: "Bill Harris" <bhvwd@...>
                                  To: <existlist@yahoogroups.com>
                                  Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2001 1:36 PM
                                  Subject: Re: [existlist] Human Nature


                                  > Americas philosopher, president postulated we have a right to life liberty
                                  > and the persuit of hapiness. What a complex and revolutinary concept
                                  > ,carried in so few words. The biologic imperative demands that we are born
                                  > ,we reproduce, we die. The individual contracts with society for mutual
                                  > benefit. The government acts as arbitrer of this contract through the
                                  > construct of law. Assigning a value to various labors has been an ongoing
                                  > problem. The emergence of lazy parasitic social classes has destroied the
                                  > work ethic in countless societies , tribes and clans. Perhaps philosophy
                                  > must shoulder the responsibility of providing a framework of values from
                                  > wich the labors of the individual will be compensated by society.
                                  > ----- Original Message -----
                                  > From: C. S. Wyatt <cswyatt@...>
                                  > To: <existlist@yahoogroups.com>
                                  > Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2001 12:24 AM
                                  > Subject: RE: [existlist] Human Nature
                                  >
                                  >
                                  > > I believe people "naturally" seek pleasure and are self-serving.
                                  > Curiously,
                                  > > some people are "wired" through nature or nurture (though free will
                                  > allows
                                  > > us to change) to enjoy pain and/or destruction. Even saints are
                                  > > self-serving, Augustine argued. There is the hope of eternal life -- and
                                  > > nothing is more self-serving than eternal life.
                                  > >
                                  > > In my worldview, I want a well-educated populous and a stable
                                  government.
                                  > > These are self-serving because I cannot perform certain tasks, such as
                                  > > dental work or internal medicine. I compromise some freedoms to exist in
                                  a
                                  > > society -- a choice I make actively each day. This society, for the most
                                  > > part, meets my needs.
                                  > >
                                  > > I am selfish and pleasure-seeking. However, my "selfishness" is along
                                  the
                                  > > lines of Adam Smith. (I own two businesses -- a bookstore and a
                                  publishing
                                  > > consultancy.) For Sartre, selfishness meant embracing socialism with its
                                  > > promise of meeting essential needs. We know how he sought pleasure.
                                  > >
                                  > > On the personal responsibility issue -- I believe laziness is all too
                                  > common
                                  > > in society. People aren't willing to work to obtain what they want. A
                                  true
                                  > > pleasure seeker is willing to overcome minor obstacles -- like work --
                                  to
                                  > > obtain what they want.
                                  > >
                                  > > - C. S. Wyatt
                                  > > http://www.tameri.com A site for writers
                                  > > http://www.tameri.com/csw My home on the web
                                  > >
                                  > > I am what I am at this moment, not what I was and certainly not all that
                                  I
                                  > > shall be.
                                  > >
                                  > >
                                  > >
                                  > >
                                  > > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
                                  > > existlist-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
                                  > >
                                  > >
                                  > >
                                  > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
                                  http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
                                  > >
                                  >
                                  >
                                  >
                                  > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
                                  > existlist-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
                                  >
                                  >
                                  >
                                  > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
                                  >
                                  >
                                Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.