Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

30341Re: The inherancy of gray

Expand Messages
  • louise
    Sep 7, 2004
      You're right, and no blue. Jesus!

      --- In existlist@yahoogroups.com, "bhvwd" <valleywestdental@q...>
      > Reason deals in probabilities. Will the hurricane move west or
      > north, will the asteroid cross earth orbit. It is customary to
      > express the probability in % and for more precise determinations
      > margin of error numbers are projected for the sample.
      > Some situations are wonderfully reliable and predictable and
      > become the laws of science. These easy calls rarely enter the
      > area of equil probability where metaphysics and faith begin to
      > sway. Even in a 60/40 probability, with good data and analysis I
      > would choose the greater probability. I understand there is a 40%
      > chance I will be wrong. If the pope took the side of lesser
      > probability I would not change my decision. If my favorite bird
      > augerer read the entrails contrary to the numbers, I would rely on
      > the numbers not the guts. Should I have a dream that contradicts
      > the probability, even if that dream is most terrifyingly
      > I would not change my decision.
      > This is the method of a modern thinker. I will not accept the
      > notion I am some cold automoton devoid of humanity. I also will
      > accept guilt if the lessed probability prevails. I am not a seer
      > prophet and I accept no credit for influence upon any outcome. I
      > think that with better data and analytical methods I can increase
      > chance of positive results.
      > So, yes, I too must live with the great gray area that so far
      > defies analysis. I think it more beneficial to reduce that gray
      > by comprehension than it is to leap into faith. Such an attitude
      > modus operandi makes me more human, less animal and more
      > Bill
    • Show all 6 messages in this topic